Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Fix handling of TCR2_EL1

Oliver Upton
2024-06-28T19:13:24Z

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:00:36 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> As I'm inching towards supporting FEAT_S1PIE in a NV guest (oh, the
> fun I'm having!), it has become obvious that we're missing the basics
> when it comes to:
>
> - VM configuration: HCRX_EL2.TCR2En is forced to 1, and we blindly
> save/restore stuff.
>
> [...]

Applied to kvmarm/next, thanks!

[1/5] KVM: arm64: Correctly honor the presence of FEAT_TCRX
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/9b58e665d6b2
[2/5] KVM: arm64: Get rid of HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/a3ee9ce88ba3
[3/5] KVM: arm64: Make TCR2_EL1 save/restore dependent on the VM features
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/1b04fd40275e
[4/5] KVM: arm64: Make PIR{,E0}_EL1 save/restore conditional on FEAT_TCRX
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/663abf04ee4d
[5/5] KVM: arm64: Honor trap routing for TCR2_EL1
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/91e9cc70b775

--
Best,
Oliver