public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
	Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v5 14/18] x86: pmu: Adjust lower boundary of llc-misses event to 0 for legacy CPUs
Date: Wed,  3 Jul 2024 09:57:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240703095712.64202-15-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240703095712.64202-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

For these legacy Intel CPUs without clflush/clflushopt support, there is
on way to force to trigger a LLC miss and the measured llc misses is
possible to be 0. Thus adjust the lower boundary of llc-misses event to
0 to avoid possible false positive.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 x86/pmu.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 799d8d5c..c9c5fc19 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct pmu_event {
 enum {
 	INTEL_INSTRUCTIONS_IDX  = 1,
 	INTEL_REF_CYCLES_IDX	= 2,
+	INTEL_LLC_MISSES_IDX	= 4,
 	INTEL_BRANCHES_IDX	= 5,
 };
 
@@ -877,6 +878,15 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
 		gp_events_size = sizeof(intel_gp_events)/sizeof(intel_gp_events[0]);
 		instruction_idx = INTEL_INSTRUCTIONS_IDX;
 		branch_idx = INTEL_BRANCHES_IDX;
+
+		/*
+		 * For legacy Intel CPUS without clflush/clflushopt support,
+		 * there is no way to force to trigger a LLC miss, thus set
+		 * the minimum value to 0 to avoid false positives.
+		 */
+		if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
+			gp_events[INTEL_LLC_MISSES_IDX].min = 0;
+
 		report_prefix_push("Intel");
 		set_ref_cycle_expectations();
 	} else {
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-03  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-03  9:56 [Patch v5 00/18] pmu test bugs fix and improvements Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:56 ` [Patch v5 01/18] x86: pmu: Remove duplicate code in pmu_init() Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:56 ` [Patch v5 02/18] x86: pmu: Remove blank line and redundant space Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:56 ` [Patch v5 03/18] x86: pmu: Refine fixed_events[] names Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:56 ` [Patch v5 04/18] x86: pmu: Fix the issue that pmu_counter_t.config crosses cache line Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:56 ` [Patch v5 05/18] x86: pmu: Enlarge cnt[] length to 48 in check_counters_many() Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 06/18] x86: pmu: Add asserts to warn inconsistent fixed events and counters Dapeng Mi
2024-08-22 18:22   ` Jim Mattson
2024-08-26  6:56     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-08-26 18:36       ` Jim Mattson
2024-08-27  0:41         ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 07/18] x86: pmu: Fix cycles event validation failure Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 08/18] x86: pmu: Use macro to replace hard-coded branches event index Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 09/18] x86: pmu: Use macro to replace hard-coded ref-cycles " Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 10/18] x86: pmu: Use macro to replace hard-coded instructions " Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 11/18] x86: pmu: Enable and disable PMCs in loop() asm blob Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 12/18] x86: pmu: Improve instruction and branches events verification Dapeng Mi
2024-07-04  8:02   ` Sandipan Das
2024-07-04 12:21     ` Mi, Dapeng
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 13/18] x86: pmu: Improve LLC misses event verification Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 15/18] x86: pmu: Add IBPB indirect jump asm blob Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 16/18] x86: pmu: Adjust lower boundary of branch-misses event Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 17/18] x86: pmu: Optimize emulated instruction validation Dapeng Mi
2024-07-03  9:57 ` [Patch v5 18/18] x86: pmu: Print measured event count if test fails Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240703095712.64202-15-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiong.y.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox