From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 10:14:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240912101434.14aafd7a@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240902115002.199331-2-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 13:50:00 +0200
Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Add a test case verifying basic running and interaction of ucontrol VMs.
> Fill the segment and page tables for allocated memory and map memory on
> first access.
>
> * uc_map_unmap
> Store and load data to mapped and unmapped memory and use pic segment
> translation handling to map memory on access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> index 030c59010fe1..04a0d55af617 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/ucontrol_test.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,11 @@
> #include <linux/capability.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
>
> +#define PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION 0x10
> +
> #define VM_MEM_SIZE (4 * SZ_1M)
> +#define VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE (2 * SZ_1M)
> +#define VM_MEM_MAX_M ((VM_MEM_SIZE + VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE) / SZ_1M)
>
> /* so directly declare capget to check caps without libcap */
> int capget(cap_user_header_t header, cap_user_data_t data);
> @@ -58,6 +62,23 @@ asm("test_gprs_asm:\n"
> " j 0b\n"
> );
>
> +/* Test program manipulating memory */
> +extern char test_mem_asm[];
> +asm("test_mem_asm:\n"
> + "xgr %r0, %r0\n"
> +
> + "0:\n"
> + " ahi %r0,1\n"
> + " st %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
> +
> + " xgr %r1,%r1\n"
> + " l %r1,0(%r5,%r6)\n"
> + " ahi %r0,1\n"
> + " diag 0,0,0x44\n"
> +
> + " j 0b\n"
> +);
> +
> FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
> {
> struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block;
> @@ -67,6 +88,7 @@ FIXTURE(uc_kvm)
> uintptr_t base_hva;
> uintptr_t code_hva;
> int kvm_run_size;
> + vm_paddr_t pgd;
> void *vm_mem;
> int vcpu_fd;
> int kvm_fd;
> @@ -116,7 +138,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(uc_kvm)
> self->base_gpa = 0;
> self->code_gpa = self->base_gpa + (3 * SZ_1M);
>
> - self->vm_mem = aligned_alloc(SZ_1M, VM_MEM_SIZE);
> + self->vm_mem = aligned_alloc(SZ_1M, VM_MEM_MAX_M * SZ_1M);
> ASSERT_NE(NULL, self->vm_mem) TH_LOG("malloc failed %u", errno);
> self->base_hva = (uintptr_t)self->vm_mem;
> self->code_hva = self->base_hva - self->base_gpa + self->code_gpa;
> @@ -222,6 +244,36 @@ TEST(uc_cap_hpage)
> close(kvm_fd);
> }
>
> +/* calculate host virtual addr from guest physical addr */
> +static void *gpa2hva(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self, u64 gpa)
> +{
> + return (void *)(self->base_hva - self->base_gpa + gpa);
> +}
> +
> +static void uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> +{
> + struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> + switch (run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code) {
> + case PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION:
> + pr_info("ucontrol pic segment translation 0x%llx\n",
> + run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
> + /* map / make additional memory available */
> + struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
> + .user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code),
> + .vcpu_addr = run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code,
> + .length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
> + };
you could use the wrapper here too (see below)
> + pr_info("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx\n",
> + (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2));
> + break;
so this will always return true
> + default:
> + TEST_FAIL("UNEXPECTED PGM CODE %d", run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* verify SIEIC exit
> * * reset stop requests
> * * fail on codes not expected in the test cases
> @@ -256,6 +308,12 @@ static bool uc_handle_exit(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
>
> switch (run->exit_reason) {
> + case KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL:
> + /** check program interruption code
> + * handle page fault --> ucas map
> + */
> + uc_handle_exit_ucontrol(self);
> + break;
> case KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC:
> return uc_handle_sieic(self);
> default:
> @@ -287,6 +345,67 @@ static void uc_assert_diag44(FIXTURE_DATA(uc_kvm) * self)
> TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0x440000, sie_block->ipb);
> }
>
> +TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_map_unmap)
> +{
> + struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
> + struct kvm_run *run = self->run;
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* copy test_mem_asm to code_hva / code_gpa */
> + TH_LOG("copy code %p to vm mapped memory %p / %p",
> + &test_mem_asm, (void *)self->code_hva, (void *)self->code_gpa);
> + memcpy((void *)self->code_hva, &test_mem_asm, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + /* DAT disabled + 64 bit mode */
> + run->psw_mask = 0x0000000180000000ULL;
> + run->psw_addr = self->code_gpa;
> +
> + /* set register content for test_mem_asm to access not mapped memory*/
> + sync_regs->gprs[1] = 0x55;
> + sync_regs->gprs[5] = self->base_gpa;
> + sync_regs->gprs[6] = VM_MEM_SIZE;
> + run->kvm_dirty_regs |= KVM_SYNC_GPRS;
> +
> + /* run and expect to fail with ucontrol pic segment translation */
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> + ASSERT_EQ(1, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION, run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
> + ASSERT_EQ(self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, run->s390_ucontrol.trans_exc_code);
> + /* map / make additional memory available */
> + struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping map2 = {
> + .user_addr = (u64)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE),
> + .vcpu_addr = self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE,
> + .length = VM_MEM_EXT_SIZE,
> + };
> + TH_LOG("ucas map %p %p 0x%llx",
> + (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr,
> map2.length);
> + rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_MAP, &map2);
maybe you can put the map/unmap IOCTLs in a wrapper, so that this
becomes more readable?
rc = uc_map_ext(self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE, self->base_gpa +VM_MEM_SIZE);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
> + TH_LOG("ucas map result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> + ASSERT_EQ(false, uc_handle_exit(self));
> + uc_assert_diag44(self);
> +
> + /* assert registers and memory are in expected state */
> + ASSERT_EQ(2, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0x55, sync_regs->gprs[1]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0x55, *(u32 *)gpa2hva(self, self->base_gpa + VM_MEM_SIZE));
> +
> + /* unmap and run loop again */
> + TH_LOG("ucas unmap %p %p 0x%llx",
> + (void *)map2.user_addr, (void *)map2.vcpu_addr, map2.length);
> + rc = ioctl(self->vcpu_fd, KVM_S390_UCAS_UNMAP, &map2);
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, rc)
> + TH_LOG("ucas unmap result %d not expected, %s", rc, strerror(errno));
> + ASSERT_EQ(0, uc_run_once(self));
> + ASSERT_EQ(3, sync_regs->gprs[0]);
> + ASSERT_EQ(KVM_EXIT_S390_UCONTROL, run->exit_reason);
> + ASSERT_EQ(PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION, run->s390_ucontrol.pgm_code);
> + ASSERT_EQ(true, uc_handle_exit(self));
> +}
> +
> TEST_F(uc_kvm, uc_gprs)
> {
> struct kvm_sync_regs *sync_regs = &self->run->s.regs;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-02 11:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-09-02 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case Christoph Schlameuss
2024-09-12 8:14 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2024-09-02 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey " Christoph Schlameuss
2024-09-12 8:15 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-09-12 14:29 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2024-09-02 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240912101434.14aafd7a@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox