From: "Markku Ahvenjärvi" <mankku@gmail.com>
To: seanjc@google.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
janne.karhunen@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mankku@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:42:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002124324.14360-1-mankku@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zu0vvRyCyUaQ2S2a@google.com>
Hi Sean,
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024, Markku Ahvenjärvi wrote:
> > Running certain hypervisors under KVM on VMX suffered L1 hangs after
> > launching a nested guest. The external interrupts were not processed on
> > vmlaunch/vmresume due to stale VPPR, and L2 guest would resume without
> > allowing L1 hypervisor to process the events.
> >
> > The patch ensures VPPR to be updated when checking for pending
> > interrupts.
>
> This is architecturally incorrect, PPR isn't refreshed at VM-Enter.
I looked into this and found the following from Intel manual:
"30.1.3 PPR Virtualization
The processor performs PPR virtualization in response to the following
operations: (1) VM entry; (2) TPR virtualization; and (3) EOI virtualization.
..."
The section "27.3.2.5 Updating Non-Register State" further explains the VM
enter:
"If the “virtual-interrupt delivery” VM-execution control is 1, VM entry loads
the values of RVI and SVI from the guest interrupt-status field in the VMCS
(see Section 25.4.2). After doing so, the logical processor first causes PPR
virtualization (Section 30.1.3) and then evaluates pending virtual interrupts
(Section 30.2.1). If a virtual interrupt is recognized, it may be delivered in
VMX non-root operation immediately after VM entry (including any specified
event injection) completes; ..."
According to that, PPR is supposed to be refreshed at VM-Enter, or am I
missing something here?
Kind regards,
Markku
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 7:59 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 8:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-20 12:40 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-02 12:42 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi [this message]
2024-10-02 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 11:29 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-10 11:00 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-14 10:57 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-16 18:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-17 13:27 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-17 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241002124324.14360-1-mankku@gmail.com \
--to=mankku@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox