public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	 Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Fix bugs in vCPUs xarray usage
Date: Wed,  9 Oct 2024 08:04:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241009150455.1057573-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)

This series stems from Will's observation[*] that kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu()'s
handling of xa_store() failure when inserting into vcpu_array is technically
broken, although in practice it's impossible for xa_store() to fail.

After much back and forth and staring, I realized that commit afb2acb2e3a3
("KVM: Fix vcpu_array[0] races") papered over underlying bugs in
kvm_get_vcpu() and kvm_for_each_vcpu().  The core problem is that KVM
allowed other tasks to see vCPU0 while online_vcpus==0, and thus trying
to gracefully error out of vCPU creation led to use-after-free failures.

So, rather than trying to solve the unsolvable problem for an error path
that should be impossible to hit, fix the underlying issue and ensure that
vcpu_array[0] is accessed if and only if online_vcpus is non-zero.

Patch 3 fixes a race Michal identified when we were trying to figure out
how to handle the xa_store() mess.

Patch 4 reverts afb2acb2e3a3.

Patches 5 and 6 are tangentially related cleanups.

[*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240730155646.1687-1-will%40kernel.org

Sean Christopherson (6):
  KVM: Explicitly verify target vCPU is online in kvm_get_vcpu()
  KVM: Verify there's at least one online vCPU when iterating over all
    vCPUs
  KVM: Grab vcpu->mutex across installing the vCPU's fd and bumping
    online_vcpus
  Revert "KVM: Fix vcpu_array[0] races"
  KVM: Don't BUG() the kernel if xa_insert() fails with -EBUSY
  KVM: Drop hack that "manually" informs lockdep of kvm->lock vs.
    vcpu->mutex

 include/linux/kvm_host.h | 16 ++++++++--
 virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)


base-commit: 8cf0b93919e13d1e8d4466eb4080a4c4d9d66d7b
-- 
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 15:04 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-10-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: Explicitly verify target vCPU is online in kvm_get_vcpu() Sean Christopherson
2024-10-10  5:31   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2024-10-10 15:54     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-10 16:33       ` Gupta, Pankaj
2024-10-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: Verify there's at least one online vCPU when iterating over all vCPUs Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: Grab vcpu->mutex across installing the vCPU's fd and bumping online_vcpus Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] Revert "KVM: Fix vcpu_array[0] races" Sean Christopherson
2024-10-10 12:46   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-10 17:48     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-20 11:23       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-16 23:05         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: Don't BUG() the kernel if xa_insert() fails with -EBUSY Sean Christopherson
2024-10-10  5:33   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2024-10-09 15:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: Drop hack that "manually" informs lockdep of kvm->lock vs. vcpu->mutex Sean Christopherson
2024-10-29 14:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: Fix bugs in vCPUs xarray usage Will Deacon
2024-12-19  2:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-19 14:18   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241009150455.1057573-1-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox