* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests
@ 2024-11-06 11:38 Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast Andrew Jones
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2024-11-06 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvm-riscv; +Cc: cade.richard, atishp, jamestiotio
Repost Cade's IPI test patch[1] with all the changes pointed out in the
last review and more.
Based-on: https://gitlab.com/jones-drew/kvm-unit-tests/-/commits/riscv/sbi
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826065106.20281-1-cade.richard@berkeley.edu/
v2:
- Rebased on latest riscv/sbi
- Improved ipi done checking by introducing cpumask_equal
- Added a patch for another IPI test case
Andrew Jones (2):
riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast
riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test
Cade Richard (1):
riscv: sbi: Add IPI extension tests
lib/cpumask.h | 13 ++++
lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h | 1 +
lib/riscv/sbi.c | 7 +-
riscv/sbi.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
riscv/unittests.cfg | 1 +
5 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast
2024-11-06 11:38 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
@ 2024-11-06 11:38 ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI extension tests Andrew Jones
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2024-11-06 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvm-riscv; +Cc: cade.richard, atishp, jamestiotio
Coming SBI IPI tests will use this, but as it could be useful for
other tests too, add it to the library.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
---
lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h | 1 +
lib/riscv/sbi.c | 7 ++++++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h b/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
index 1319439b7118..102486c00de3 100644
--- a/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
+++ b/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct sbiret sbi_hart_get_status(unsigned long hartid);
struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi(unsigned long hart_mask, unsigned long hart_mask_base);
struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi_cpu(int cpu);
struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi_cpumask(const cpumask_t *mask);
+struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi_broadcast(void);
struct sbiret sbi_set_timer(unsigned long stime_value);
long sbi_probe(int ext);
diff --git a/lib/riscv/sbi.c b/lib/riscv/sbi.c
index f25bde169490..02dd338c1915 100644
--- a/lib/riscv/sbi.c
+++ b/lib/riscv/sbi.c
@@ -62,13 +62,18 @@ struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi_cpu(int cpu)
return sbi_send_ipi(1UL, cpus[cpu].hartid);
}
+struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi_broadcast(void)
+{
+ return sbi_send_ipi(0, -1UL);
+}
+
struct sbiret sbi_send_ipi_cpumask(const cpumask_t *mask)
{
struct sbiret ret;
cpumask_t tmp;
if (cpumask_full(mask))
- return sbi_send_ipi(0, -1UL);
+ return sbi_send_ipi_broadcast();
cpumask_copy(&tmp, mask);
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI extension tests
2024-11-06 11:38 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast Andrew Jones
@ 2024-11-06 11:38 ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test Andrew Jones
2024-11-11 15:07 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2024-11-06 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvm-riscv; +Cc: cade.richard, atishp, jamestiotio, Cade Richard
From: Cade Richard <cade.richard@gmail.com>
Ensure IPIs directed at single harts are received and also that all
harts receive IPIs on broadcast. Also check for invalid param errors
when the params result in hartids greater than the max.
Signed-off-by: Cade Richard <cade.richard@berkeley.edu>
Co-developed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
---
lib/cpumask.h | 13 ++++
riscv/sbi.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
riscv/unittests.cfg | 1 +
3 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.h b/lib/cpumask.h
index 37d360786573..b4cd83a66a56 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.h
+++ b/lib/cpumask.h
@@ -72,6 +72,19 @@ static inline bool cpumask_subset(const struct cpumask *src1, const struct cpuma
return !lastmask || !((cpumask_bits(src1)[i] & ~cpumask_bits(src2)[i]) & lastmask);
}
+static inline bool cpumask_equal(const struct cpumask *src1, const struct cpumask *src2)
+{
+ unsigned long lastmask = BIT_MASK(nr_cpus) - 1;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BIT_WORD(nr_cpus); ++i) {
+ if (cpumask_bits(src1)[i] != cpumask_bits(src2)[i])
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return !lastmask || (cpumask_bits(src1)[i] & lastmask) == (cpumask_bits(src2)[i] & lastmask);
+}
+
static inline bool cpumask_empty(const cpumask_t *mask)
{
unsigned long lastmask = BIT_MASK(nr_cpus) - 1;
diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
index c081953c877c..cdf8d13cc9cf 100644
--- a/riscv/sbi.c
+++ b/riscv/sbi.c
@@ -6,11 +6,15 @@
*/
#include <libcflat.h>
#include <alloc_page.h>
+#include <cpumask.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <memregions.h>
+#include <on-cpus.h>
+#include <rand.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
-#include <limits.h>
#include <vmalloc.h>
-#include <memregions.h>
+
#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/csr.h>
#include <asm/delay.h>
@@ -46,6 +50,20 @@ static struct sbiret sbi_dbcn_write_byte(uint8_t byte)
return sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBCN, SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE_BYTE, byte, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
}
+static int rand_online_cpu(prng_state *ps)
+{
+ int cpu, me = smp_processor_id();
+
+ for (;;) {
+ cpu = prng32(ps) % nr_cpus;
+ cpu = cpumask_next(cpu - 1, &cpu_present_mask);
+ if (cpu != nr_cpus && cpu != me && cpu_present(cpu))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return cpu;
+}
+
static void split_phys_addr(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long *hi, unsigned long *lo)
{
*lo = (unsigned long)paddr;
@@ -286,6 +304,130 @@ static void check_time(void)
report_prefix_popn(2);
}
+static bool ipi_received[NR_CPUS];
+static bool ipi_timeout[NR_CPUS];
+static cpumask_t ipi_done;
+
+static void ipi_timeout_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ timer_stop();
+ ipi_timeout[smp_processor_id()] = true;
+}
+
+static void ipi_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ ipi_ack();
+ ipi_received[smp_processor_id()] = true;
+}
+
+static void ipi_hart_wait(void *data)
+{
+ unsigned long timeout = (unsigned long)data;
+ int me = smp_processor_id();
+
+ install_irq_handler(IRQ_S_SOFT, ipi_irq_handler);
+ install_irq_handler(IRQ_S_TIMER, ipi_timeout_handler);
+ local_ipi_enable();
+ timer_irq_enable();
+ local_irq_enable();
+
+ timer_start(timeout);
+ while (!READ_ONCE(ipi_received[me]) && !READ_ONCE(ipi_timeout[me]))
+ cpu_relax();
+ local_irq_disable();
+ timer_stop();
+ local_ipi_disable();
+ timer_irq_disable();
+
+ cpumask_set_cpu(me, &ipi_done);
+}
+
+static void ipi_hart_check(cpumask_t *mask)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ if (ipi_timeout[cpu]) {
+ const char *rec = ipi_received[cpu] ? "but was still received"
+ : "and has still not been received";
+ report_fail("ipi timed out on cpu%d %s", cpu, rec);
+ }
+
+ ipi_timeout[cpu] = false;
+ ipi_received[cpu] = false;
+ }
+}
+
+static void check_ipi(void)
+{
+ unsigned long d = getenv("SBI_IPI_TIMEOUT") ? strtol(getenv("SBI_IPI_TIMEOUT"), NULL, 0) : 200000;
+ int nr_cpus_present = cpumask_weight(&cpu_present_mask);
+ int me = smp_processor_id();
+ unsigned long max_hartid = 0;
+ cpumask_t ipi_receivers;
+ static prng_state ps;
+ struct sbiret ret;
+ int cpu;
+
+ ps = prng_init(0xDEADBEEF);
+
+ report_prefix_push("ipi");
+
+ if (!sbi_probe(SBI_EXT_IPI)) {
+ report_skip("ipi extension not available");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (nr_cpus_present < 2) {
+ report_skip("At least 2 cpus required");
+ report_prefix_pop();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ report_prefix_push("random hart");
+ cpumask_clear(&ipi_done);
+ cpumask_clear(&ipi_receivers);
+ cpu = rand_online_cpu(&ps);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &ipi_receivers);
+ on_cpu_async(cpu, ipi_hart_wait, (void *)d);
+ ret = sbi_send_ipi_cpu(cpu);
+ report(ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS, "ipi returned success");
+ while (!cpumask_equal(&ipi_done, &ipi_receivers))
+ cpu_relax();
+ ipi_hart_check(&ipi_receivers);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("broadcast");
+ cpumask_clear(&ipi_done);
+ cpumask_copy(&ipi_receivers, &cpu_present_mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(me, &ipi_receivers);
+ on_cpumask_async(&ipi_receivers, ipi_hart_wait, (void *)d);
+ ret = sbi_send_ipi_broadcast();
+ report(ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS, "ipi returned success");
+ while (!cpumask_equal(&ipi_done, &ipi_receivers))
+ cpu_relax();
+ ipi_hart_check(&ipi_receivers);
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_push("invalid parameters");
+
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (cpus[cpu].hartid > max_hartid)
+ max_hartid = cpus[cpu].hartid;
+ }
+
+ /* Try the next higher hartid than the max */
+ ret = sbi_send_ipi(2, max_hartid);
+ report_kfail(true, ret.error == SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM, "hart_mask got expected error (%ld)", ret.error);
+ ret = sbi_send_ipi(1, max_hartid + 1);
+ report_kfail(true, ret.error == SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM, "hart_mask_base got expected error (%ld)", ret.error);
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
#define DBCN_WRITE_TEST_STRING "DBCN_WRITE_TEST_STRING\n"
#define DBCN_WRITE_BYTE_TEST_BYTE ((u8)'a')
@@ -437,6 +579,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
report_prefix_push("sbi");
check_base();
check_time();
+ check_ipi();
check_dbcn();
return report_summary();
diff --git a/riscv/unittests.cfg b/riscv/unittests.cfg
index cbd36bf63e14..2eb760eca24e 100644
--- a/riscv/unittests.cfg
+++ b/riscv/unittests.cfg
@@ -16,4 +16,5 @@ groups = selftest
# Set $FIRMWARE_OVERRIDE to /path/to/firmware to select the SBI implementation.
[sbi]
file = sbi.flat
+smp = $MAX_SMP
groups = sbi
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test
2024-11-06 11:38 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI extension tests Andrew Jones
@ 2024-11-06 11:38 ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 12:22 ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-11 15:07 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2024-11-06 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvm-riscv; +Cc: cade.richard, atishp, jamestiotio
We should ensure that when hart_mask has more than one hartid
that both harts get IPIs with a single call of the IPI function.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
---
riscv/sbi.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
index cdf8d13cc9cf..8ccdf42f902a 100644
--- a/riscv/sbi.c
+++ b/riscv/sbi.c
@@ -364,10 +364,11 @@ static void check_ipi(void)
int nr_cpus_present = cpumask_weight(&cpu_present_mask);
int me = smp_processor_id();
unsigned long max_hartid = 0;
+ unsigned long hartid1, hartid2;
cpumask_t ipi_receivers;
static prng_state ps;
struct sbiret ret;
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, cpu2;
ps = prng_init(0xDEADBEEF);
@@ -398,6 +399,42 @@ static void check_ipi(void)
ipi_hart_check(&ipi_receivers);
report_prefix_pop();
+ report_prefix_push("two in hart_mask");
+
+ if (nr_cpus_present < 3) {
+ report_skip("3 cpus required");
+ goto end_two;
+ }
+
+ cpu = rand_online_cpu(&ps);
+ hartid1 = cpus[cpu].hartid;
+ hartid2 = 0;
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu2) {
+ if (cpu2 == cpu || cpu2 == me)
+ continue;
+ hartid2 = cpus[cpu2].hartid;
+ if (__builtin_labs(hartid2 - hartid1) < BITS_PER_LONG)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (cpu2 == nr_cpus) {
+ report_skip("hartids are too sparse");
+ goto end_two;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_clear(&ipi_done);
+ cpumask_clear(&ipi_receivers);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &ipi_receivers);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, &ipi_receivers);
+ on_cpu_async(cpu, ipi_hart_wait, (void *)d);
+ on_cpu_async(cpu2, ipi_hart_wait, (void *)d);
+ ret = sbi_send_ipi((1UL << __builtin_labs(hartid2 - hartid1)) | 1UL, hartid1 < hartid2 ? hartid1 : hartid2);
+ report(ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS, "ipi returned success");
+ while (!cpumask_equal(&ipi_done, &ipi_receivers))
+ cpu_relax();
+ ipi_hart_check(&ipi_receivers);
+end_two:
+ report_prefix_pop();
+
report_prefix_push("broadcast");
cpumask_clear(&ipi_done);
cpumask_copy(&ipi_receivers, &cpu_present_mask);
--
2.47.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test Andrew Jones
@ 2024-11-06 12:22 ` Andrew Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2024-11-06 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvm-riscv; +Cc: cade.richard, atishp, jamestiotio
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 12:38:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> We should ensure that when hart_mask has more than one hartid
> that both harts get IPIs with a single call of the IPI function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
> ---
> riscv/sbi.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index cdf8d13cc9cf..8ccdf42f902a 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -364,10 +364,11 @@ static void check_ipi(void)
> int nr_cpus_present = cpumask_weight(&cpu_present_mask);
> int me = smp_processor_id();
> unsigned long max_hartid = 0;
> + unsigned long hartid1, hartid2;
> cpumask_t ipi_receivers;
> static prng_state ps;
> struct sbiret ret;
> - int cpu;
> + int cpu, cpu2;
>
> ps = prng_init(0xDEADBEEF);
>
> @@ -398,6 +399,42 @@ static void check_ipi(void)
> ipi_hart_check(&ipi_receivers);
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> + report_prefix_push("two in hart_mask");
> +
> + if (nr_cpus_present < 3) {
> + report_skip("3 cpus required");
> + goto end_two;
> + }
> +
> + cpu = rand_online_cpu(&ps);
> + hartid1 = cpus[cpu].hartid;
> + hartid2 = 0;
> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu2) {
> + if (cpu2 == cpu || cpu2 == me)
> + continue;
> + hartid2 = cpus[cpu2].hartid;
> + if (__builtin_labs(hartid2 - hartid1) < BITS_PER_LONG)
clang is complaining about these __builtin_labs calls not taking signed
input. I'll add this wrapper
static long __labs(long a)
{
return __builtin_labs(a);
}
> + break;
> + }
> + if (cpu2 == nr_cpus) {
> + report_skip("hartids are too sparse");
> + goto end_two;
> + }
> +
> + cpumask_clear(&ipi_done);
> + cpumask_clear(&ipi_receivers);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &ipi_receivers);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu2, &ipi_receivers);
> + on_cpu_async(cpu, ipi_hart_wait, (void *)d);
> + on_cpu_async(cpu2, ipi_hart_wait, (void *)d);
> + ret = sbi_send_ipi((1UL << __builtin_labs(hartid2 - hartid1)) | 1UL, hartid1 < hartid2 ? hartid1 : hartid2);
> + report(ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS, "ipi returned success");
> + while (!cpumask_equal(&ipi_done, &ipi_receivers))
> + cpu_relax();
> + ipi_hart_check(&ipi_receivers);
> +end_two:
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> report_prefix_push("broadcast");
> cpumask_clear(&ipi_done);
> cpumask_copy(&ipi_receivers, &cpu_present_mask);
> --
> 2.47.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests
2024-11-06 11:38 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test Andrew Jones
@ 2024-11-11 15:07 ` Andrew Jones
3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jones @ 2024-11-11 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvm, kvm-riscv; +Cc: cade.richard, atishp, jamestiotio
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 12:38:15PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Repost Cade's IPI test patch[1] with all the changes pointed out in the
> last review and more.
>
> Based-on: https://gitlab.com/jones-drew/kvm-unit-tests/-/commits/riscv/sbi
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826065106.20281-1-cade.richard@berkeley.edu/
>
> v2:
> - Rebased on latest riscv/sbi
> - Improved ipi done checking by introducing cpumask_equal
> - Added a patch for another IPI test case
>
>
> Andrew Jones (2):
> riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast
> riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test
>
> Cade Richard (1):
> riscv: sbi: Add IPI extension tests
>
> lib/cpumask.h | 13 ++++
> lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h | 1 +
> lib/riscv/sbi.c | 7 +-
> riscv/sbi.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> riscv/unittests.cfg | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.47.0
>
Merged through riscv/sbi.
Thanks,
drew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-11 15:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-06 11:38 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: Add sbi_send_ipi_broadcast Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI extension tests Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 11:38 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: sbi: Add two in hart_mask IPI test Andrew Jones
2024-11-06 12:22 ` Andrew Jones
2024-11-11 15:07 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sbi: Add IPI tests Andrew Jones
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox