From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Couple of small cmpxchg() optimizations
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:11:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241126131144.0a076101@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241126102515.3178914-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:25:12 +0100
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
looks good, and it's a follow-up of your cmpxchg series, so I think it
should go through the s390 kernel tree
(but please try to add the comment in patch 3)
> v2:
> - Replace broken WRITE_ONCE(..., 9) with intended WRITE_ONCE(..., 0).
>
> v1:
> Use try_cmpxchg() instead of cmpxchg() so compilers with flag output
> operand support (gcc 14 and newer) can generate slightly better code.
>
> Also get rid of two cmpxchg() usages on one/two byte memory areas
> which generates inefficient code.
>
> bloat-o-meter statistics of the kvm module:
>
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/11 up/down: 0/-318 (-318)
> Function old new delta
> kvm_s390_handle_wait 886 880 -6
> kvm_s390_gisa_destroy 226 220 -6
> kvm_s390_gisa_clear 96 90 -6
> ipte_unlock 380 372 -8
> kvm_s390_gisc_unregister 270 260 -10
> kvm_s390_gisc_register 290 280 -10
> gisa_vcpu_kicker 200 190 -10
> account_mem 250 232 -18
> ipte_lock 416 368 -48
> kvm_s390_update_topology_change_report 174 122 -52
> kvm_s390_clear_local_irqs 420 276 -144
> Total: Before=316521, After=316203, chg -0.10%
>
> Heiko Carstens (3):
> KVM: s390: Use try_cmpxchg() instead of cmpxchg() loops
> KVM: s390: Remove one byte cmpxchg() usage
> KVM: s390: Increase size of union sca_utility to four bytes
>
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 +++++-----
> arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++--
> arch/s390/kvm/pci.c | 5 ++---
> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-26 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-26 10:25 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Couple of small cmpxchg() optimizations Heiko Carstens
2024-11-26 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: s390: Use try_cmpxchg() instead of cmpxchg() loops Heiko Carstens
2024-11-26 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: s390: Remove one byte cmpxchg() usage Heiko Carstens
2024-11-26 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: s390: Increase size of union sca_utility to four bytes Heiko Carstens
2024-11-26 11:57 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-11-26 12:09 ` Janosch Frank
2024-11-26 12:21 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-11-26 13:33 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-11-26 12:11 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2024-11-26 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Couple of small cmpxchg() optimizations Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241126131144.0a076101@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox