From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com,
chao.gao@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/16] KVM: VMX: Move posted interrupt delivery code to common header
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:07:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241209010734.3543481-5-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209010734.3543481-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Move posted interrupt delivery code to common header so that TDX can
leverage it.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
[binbin: split into new patch]
Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
---
TDX interrupts breakout:
- This is split out from patch "KVM: TDX: Implement interrupt injection"
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 59 +-------------------------------
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
index 7a592467a044..a46f15ddeda1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/common.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include "posted_intr.h"
#include "mmu.h"
static inline bool vt_is_tdx_private_gpa(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa)
@@ -40,4 +41,74 @@ static inline int __vmx_handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, error_code, NULL, 0);
}
+static inline void kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ int pi_vec)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
+ /*
+ * The vector of the virtual has already been set in the PIR.
+ * Send a notification event to deliver the virtual interrupt
+ * unless the vCPU is the currently running vCPU, i.e. the
+ * event is being sent from a fastpath VM-Exit handler, in
+ * which case the PIR will be synced to the vIRR before
+ * re-entering the guest.
+ *
+ * When the target is not the running vCPU, the following
+ * possibilities emerge:
+ *
+ * Case 1: vCPU stays in non-root mode. Sending a notification
+ * event posts the interrupt to the vCPU.
+ *
+ * Case 2: vCPU exits to root mode and is still runnable. The
+ * PIR will be synced to the vIRR before re-entering the guest.
+ * Sending a notification event is ok as the host IRQ handler
+ * will ignore the spurious event.
+ *
+ * Case 3: vCPU exits to root mode and is blocked. vcpu_block()
+ * has already synced PIR to vIRR and never blocks the vCPU if
+ * the vIRR is not empty. Therefore, a blocked vCPU here does
+ * not wait for any requested interrupts in PIR, and sending a
+ * notification event also results in a benign, spurious event.
+ */
+
+ if (vcpu != kvm_get_running_vcpu())
+ __apic_send_IPI_mask(get_cpu_mask(vcpu->cpu), pi_vec);
+ return;
+ }
+#endif
+ /*
+ * The vCPU isn't in the guest; wake the vCPU in case it is blocking,
+ * otherwise do nothing as KVM will grab the highest priority pending
+ * IRQ via ->sync_pir_to_irr() in vcpu_enter_guest().
+ */
+ kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Send interrupt to vcpu via posted interrupt way.
+ * 1. If target vcpu is running(non-root mode), send posted interrupt
+ * notification to vcpu and hardware will sync PIR to vIRR atomically.
+ * 2. If target vcpu isn't running(root mode), kick it to pick up the
+ * interrupt from PIR in next vmentry.
+ */
+static inline void __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct pi_desc *pi_desc, int vector)
+{
+ if (pi_test_and_set_pir(vector, pi_desc))
+ return;
+
+ /* If a previous notification has sent the IPI, nothing to do. */
+ if (pi_test_and_set_on(pi_desc))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * The implied barrier in pi_test_and_set_on() pairs with the smp_mb_*()
+ * after setting vcpu->mode in vcpu_enter_guest(), thus the vCPU is
+ * guaranteed to see PID.ON=1 and sync the PIR to IRR if triggering a
+ * posted interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE.
+ */
+ kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR);
+}
+
#endif /* __KVM_X86_VMX_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index f7ae2359cea2..176fd5da3a3c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4167,50 +4167,6 @@ void vmx_msr_filter_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
pt_update_intercept_for_msr(vcpu);
}
-static inline void kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
- int pi_vec)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
- /*
- * The vector of the virtual has already been set in the PIR.
- * Send a notification event to deliver the virtual interrupt
- * unless the vCPU is the currently running vCPU, i.e. the
- * event is being sent from a fastpath VM-Exit handler, in
- * which case the PIR will be synced to the vIRR before
- * re-entering the guest.
- *
- * When the target is not the running vCPU, the following
- * possibilities emerge:
- *
- * Case 1: vCPU stays in non-root mode. Sending a notification
- * event posts the interrupt to the vCPU.
- *
- * Case 2: vCPU exits to root mode and is still runnable. The
- * PIR will be synced to the vIRR before re-entering the guest.
- * Sending a notification event is ok as the host IRQ handler
- * will ignore the spurious event.
- *
- * Case 3: vCPU exits to root mode and is blocked. vcpu_block()
- * has already synced PIR to vIRR and never blocks the vCPU if
- * the vIRR is not empty. Therefore, a blocked vCPU here does
- * not wait for any requested interrupts in PIR, and sending a
- * notification event also results in a benign, spurious event.
- */
-
- if (vcpu != kvm_get_running_vcpu())
- __apic_send_IPI_mask(get_cpu_mask(vcpu->cpu), pi_vec);
- return;
- }
-#endif
- /*
- * The vCPU isn't in the guest; wake the vCPU in case it is blocking,
- * otherwise do nothing as KVM will grab the highest priority pending
- * IRQ via ->sync_pir_to_irr() in vcpu_enter_guest().
- */
- kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
-}
-
static int vmx_deliver_nested_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
int vector)
{
@@ -4270,20 +4226,7 @@ static int vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
if (!vcpu->arch.apic->apicv_active)
return -1;
- if (pi_test_and_set_pir(vector, &vmx->pi_desc))
- return 0;
-
- /* If a previous notification has sent the IPI, nothing to do. */
- if (pi_test_and_set_on(&vmx->pi_desc))
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * The implied barrier in pi_test_and_set_on() pairs with the smp_mb_*()
- * after setting vcpu->mode in vcpu_enter_guest(), thus the vCPU is
- * guaranteed to see PID.ON=1 and sync the PIR to IRR if triggering a
- * posted interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE.
- */
- kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, POSTED_INTR_VECTOR);
+ __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt(vcpu, &vmx->pi_desc, vector);
return 0;
}
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-09 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 1:07 [PATCH 00/16] KVM: TDX: TDX interrupts Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 01/16] KVM: TDX: Add support for find pending IRQ in a protected local APIC Binbin Wu
2025-01-09 15:38 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-01-10 5:36 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 02/16] KVM: VMX: Remove use of struct vcpu_vmx from posted_intr.c Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 03/16] KVM: TDX: Disable PI wakeup for IPIv Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 05/16] KVM: TDX: Implement non-NMI interrupt injection Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 06/16] KVM: x86: Assume timer IRQ was injected if APIC state is protected Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 07/16] KVM: TDX: Wait lapic expire when timer IRQ was injected Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 08/16] KVM: TDX: Implement methods to inject NMI Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 09/16] KVM: TDX: Complete interrupts after TD exit Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 10/16] KVM: TDX: Handle SMI request as !CONFIG_KVM_SMM Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 11/16] KVM: TDX: Always block INIT/SIPI Binbin Wu
2025-01-08 7:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-01-08 7:53 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-08 14:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-09 2:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-01-09 2:26 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-09 2:46 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-09 3:20 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-09 4:01 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-09 2:51 ` Huang, Kai
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 12/16] KVM: TDX: Inhibit APICv for TDX guest Binbin Wu
2025-01-03 21:59 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-01-06 1:46 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-06 22:49 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-01-06 23:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-07 3:24 ` Chao Gao
2025-01-07 8:09 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-07 21:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 2:03 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-13 2:09 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-13 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-14 8:20 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-14 16:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-16 11:55 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-16 14:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-16 20:16 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-16 22:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-17 9:53 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-17 10:46 ` Huang, Kai
2025-01-17 15:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-17 0:49 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 13/16] KVM: TDX: Add methods to ignore virtual apic related operation Binbin Wu
2025-01-03 22:04 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-01-06 2:18 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-22 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-22 13:59 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 14/16] KVM: VMX: Move NMI/exception handler to common helper Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 15/16] KVM: TDX: Handle EXCEPTION_NMI and EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT Binbin Wu
2024-12-09 1:07 ` [PATCH 16/16] KVM: TDX: Handle EXIT_REASON_OTHER_SMI Binbin Wu
2024-12-10 18:24 ` [PATCH 00/16] KVM: TDX: TDX interrupts Paolo Bonzini
2025-01-06 10:51 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-01-06 20:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-09 2:44 ` Binbin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241209010734.3543481-5-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).