From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, schlameuss@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
nrb@linux.ibm.com, nsg@linux.ibm.com, seanjc@google.com,
seiden@linux.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/15] KVM: s390: fake memslot for ucontrol VMs
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:46:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250123144627.312456-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123144627.312456-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Create a fake memslot for ucontrol VMs. The fake memslot identity-maps
userspace.
Now memslots will always be present, and ucontrol is not a special case
anymore.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index f15b61317aad..cc98115a96d7 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ fetch) is injected in the guest.
S390:
^^^^^
-Returns -EINVAL if the VM has the KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL flag set.
+Returns -EINVAL or -EEXIST if the VM has the KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL flag set.
Returns -EINVAL if called on a protected VM.
4.36 KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 97c7c8127543..9df37361bc64 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
#define KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS 248
#define KVM_MAX_VCPUS 255
+#define KVM_INTERNAL_MEM_SLOTS 1
+
/*
* These seem to be used for allocating ->chip in the routing table, which we
* don't use. 1 is as small as we can get to reduce the needed memory. If we
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index ecbdd7d41230..2d63bee23f44 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3428,8 +3428,19 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "vm created with type %lu", type);
if (type & KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL) {
+ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2 fake_memslot = {
+ .slot = KVM_S390_UCONTROL_MEMSLOT,
+ .guest_phys_addr = 0,
+ .userspace_addr = 0,
+ .memory_size = ALIGN_DOWN(TASK_SIZE, _SEGMENT_SIZE),
+ .flags = 0,
+ };
+
kvm->arch.gmap = NULL;
kvm->arch.mem_limit = KVM_S390_NO_MEM_LIMIT;
+ /* one flat fake memslot covering the whole address-space */
+ guard(mutex)(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ KVM_BUG_ON(kvm_set_internal_memslot(kvm, &fake_memslot), kvm);
} else {
if (sclp.hamax == U64_MAX)
kvm->arch.mem_limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
@@ -5854,7 +5865,7 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
{
gpa_t size;
- if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
+ if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm) && new->id < KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
return -EINVAL;
/* When we are protected, we should not change the memory slots */
@@ -5906,6 +5917,9 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
{
int rc = 0;
+ if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
+ return;
+
switch (change) {
case KVM_MR_DELETE:
rc = gmap_unmap_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE,
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index 597d7a71deeb..30736ac16f84 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/sclp.h>
+#define KVM_S390_UCONTROL_MEMSLOT (KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS + 0)
+
static inline void kvm_s390_fpu_store(struct kvm_run *run)
{
fpu_stfpc(&run->s.regs.fpc);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 14:46 [PATCH v4 00/15] KVM: s390: Stop using page->index and other things Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] KVM: Do not restrict the size of KVM-internal memory regions Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] KVM: s390: wrapper for KVM_BUG Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] KVM: s390: selftests: fix ucontrol memory region test Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-24 14:34 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] KVM: s390: move pv gmap functions into kvm Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 8:06 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] KVM: s390: use __kvm_faultin_pfn() Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] KVM: s390: get rid of gmap_fault() Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] KVM: s390: get rid of gmap_translate() Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] KVM: s390: move some gmap shadowing functions away from mm/gmap.c Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 9:16 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] KVM: s390: stop using page->index for non-shadow gmaps Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 9:26 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] KVM: s390: stop using lists to keep track of used dat tables Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] KVM: s390: move gmap_shadow_pgt_lookup() into kvm Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 9:33 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] KVM: s390: remove useless page->index usage Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 9:34 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] KVM: s390: move PGSTE softbits Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 9:35 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2025-01-23 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] KVM: s390: remove the last user of page->index Claudio Imbrenda
2025-01-27 9:36 ` Christoph Schlameuss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250123144627.312456-4-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox