From: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <pgonda@google.com>, <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
<nikunj@amd.com>, <pankaj.gupta@amd.com>, <michael.roth@amd.com>,
<sraithal@amd.com>, <prsampat@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 8/9] KVM: selftests: Abstractions for SEV to decouple policy from type
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:32:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250203223205.36121-9-prsampat@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203223205.36121-1-prsampat@amd.com>
In preparation for SNP, cleanup the smoke test to decouple deriving
type from policy. Introduce, wrappers for SEV and SEV-ES types to
abstract the parametrized launch tests calls and reduce verbosity.
No functional change intended.
Tested-by: Srikanth Aithal <sraithal@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <prsampat@amd.com>
---
v5..v6:
* Collected tags from Srikanth.
---
.../selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
index b18c78314d5b..3a36cd3ca151 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/sev_smoke_test.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void compare_xsave(u8 *from_host, u8 *from_guest)
abort();
}
-static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
+static void __test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
double x87val = M_PI;
struct kvm_xsave __attribute__((aligned(64))) xsave = { 0 };
- vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, guest_code_xsave, &vcpu);
+ vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code_xsave, &vcpu);
gva = vm_vaddr_alloc_shared(vm, PAGE_SIZE, KVM_UTIL_MIN_VADDR,
MEM_REGION_TEST_DATA);
hva = addr_gva2hva(vm, gva);
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
: "ymm4", "st", "st(1)", "st(2)", "st(3)", "st(4)", "st(5)", "st(6)", "st(7)");
vcpu_xsave_set(vcpu, &xsave);
- vm_sev_launch(vm, SEV_POLICY_ES | policy, NULL);
+ vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
/* This page is shared, so make it decrypted. */
memset(hva, 0, 4096);
@@ -107,14 +107,12 @@ static void test_sync_vmsa(uint32_t policy)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
-static void test_sev(void *guest_code, uint64_t policy)
+static void __test_sev(void *guest_code, uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct ucall uc;
- uint32_t type = policy & SEV_POLICY_ES ? KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM : KVM_X86_SEV_VM;
-
vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_code, &vcpu);
/* TODO: Validate the measurement is as expected. */
@@ -149,6 +147,21 @@ static void test_sev(void *guest_code, uint64_t policy)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+static void test_sev(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sev(guest_sev_code, KVM_X86_SEV_VM, policy);
+}
+
+static void test_sev_es(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sev(guest_sev_es_code, KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, policy);
+}
+
+static void test_sync_vmsa_sev_es(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sync_vmsa(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, policy);
+}
+
static void guest_shutdown_code(void)
{
struct desc_ptr idt;
@@ -160,16 +173,14 @@ static void guest_shutdown_code(void)
__asm__ __volatile__("ud2");
}
-static void test_sev_es_shutdown(void)
+static void __test_sev_shutdown(uint32_t type, uint64_t policy)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
- uint32_t type = KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM;
-
vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(type, guest_shutdown_code, &vcpu);
- vm_sev_launch(vm, SEV_POLICY_ES, NULL);
+ vm_sev_launch(vm, policy, NULL);
vcpu_run(vcpu);
TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN,
@@ -179,25 +190,30 @@ static void test_sev_es_shutdown(void)
kvm_vm_free(vm);
}
+static void test_sev_es_shutdown(uint64_t policy)
+{
+ __test_sev_shutdown(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, SEV_POLICY_ES);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
const u64 xf_mask = XFEATURE_MASK_X87_AVX;
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV));
- test_sev(guest_sev_code, SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
- test_sev(guest_sev_code, 0);
+ test_sev(SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sev(0);
if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SEV_ES)) {
- test_sev(guest_sev_es_code, SEV_POLICY_ES | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
- test_sev(guest_sev_es_code, SEV_POLICY_ES);
+ test_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_ES | SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_ES);
- test_sev_es_shutdown();
+ test_sev_es_shutdown(SEV_POLICY_ES);
if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS) &&
(xgetbv(0) & kvm_cpu_supported_xcr0() & xf_mask) == xf_mask) {
- test_sync_vmsa(0);
- test_sync_vmsa(SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG);
+ test_sync_vmsa_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_ES);
+ test_sync_vmsa_sev_es(SEV_POLICY_NO_DBG | SEV_POLICY_ES);
}
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 22:31 [PATCH v6 0/9] Basic SEV-SNP Selftests Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] KVM: SEV: Disable SEV-SNP on FW validation failure Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 1:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:07 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] KVM: SEV: Disable SEV on platform init failure Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 1:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:09 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:31 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] KVM: selftests: SEV-SNP test for KVM_SEV_INIT2 Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] KVM: selftests: Add VMGEXIT helper Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 1:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:09 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] KVM: selftests: Introduce SEV VM type check Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] KVM: selftests: Add library support for interacting with SNP Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 2:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:12 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-19 16:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-20 16:56 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] KVM: selftests: Force GUEST_MEMFD flag for SNP VM type Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-03 22:32 ` Pratik R. Sampat [this message]
2025-02-03 22:32 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] KVM: selftests: Add a basic SEV-SNP smoke test Pratik R. Sampat
2025-02-12 2:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-14 18:14 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2025-02-19 0:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19 14:58 ` Pratik Rajesh Sampat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250203223205.36121-9-prsampat@amd.com \
--to=prsampat@amd.com \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj@amd.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sraithal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox