From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] arm64: cpufeature: Handle NV_frac as a synonym of NV2
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:03:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220140323.GA2562076@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220134907.554085-2-maz@kernel.org>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:48:54PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> With ARMv9.5, an implementation supporting Nested Virtualization
> is allowed to only support NV2, and to avoid supporting the old
> (and useless) ARMv8.3 variant.
>
> This is indicated by ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1.NV being 0 (as if NV wasn't
> implemented) and ID_AA64MMDR4_EL1.NV_frac being 1 (indicating that
typo: ID_AA64MMDR4_EL1 -> ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1
> NV2 is actually supported).
>
> Given that KVM only deals with NV2 and refuses to use the old NV,
> detecting NV2 or NV_frac is what we need to enable it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index d561cf3b8ac7b..2c198cd4f9405 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr3[] = {
>
> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64mmfr4[] = {
> S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_E2H0_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1_NV_frac_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_END,
> };
>
> @@ -2162,7 +2163,7 @@ static bool has_nested_virt_support(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap,
> if (kvm_get_mode() != KVM_MODE_NV)
> return false;
>
> - if (!has_cpuid_feature(cap, scope)) {
> + if (!cpucap_multi_entry_cap_matches(cap, scope)) {
> pr_warn("unavailable: %s\n", cap->desc);
> return false;
> }
> @@ -2519,7 +2520,17 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> .capability = ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT,
> .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
> .matches = has_nested_virt_support,
> - ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, NV, NV2)
> + .match_list = (const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities []){
> + {
> + .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, NV, NV2)
> + },
> + {
> + .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV2_ONLY)
> + },
> + { /* Sentinel */ }
> + },
> },
> {
> .capability = ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0_DO_NOT_USE,
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 13:48 [PATCH v2 00/14] KVM: arm64: NV userspace ABI Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] arm64: cpufeature: Handle NV_frac as a synonym of NV2 Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 14:03 ` Joey Gouly [this message]
2025-02-20 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] KVM: arm64: Hide ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1.NV from guest and userspace Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 17:36 ` Sebastian Ott
2025-02-20 19:46 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-21 7:52 ` Sebastian Ott
2025-02-20 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] KVM: arm64: Mark HCR.EL2.E2H RES0 when ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VH is zero Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] KVM: arm64: Mark HCR.EL2.{NV*,AT} RES0 when ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.NV_frac is 0 Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] KVM: arm64: Advertise NV2 in the boot messages Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] KVM: arm64: Consolidate idreg callbacks Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 15:43 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] KVM: arm64: Make ID_REG_LIMIT_FIELD_ENUM() more widely available Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] KVM: arm64: Enforce NV limits on a per-idregs basis Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] KVM: arm64: Move NV-specific capping to idreg sanitisation Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to limit NV support to nVHE Marc Zyngier
2025-02-24 9:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1.NV_frac writable Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] KVM: arm64: Advertise FEAT_ECV when possible Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to request KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL2* Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] KVM: arm64: Document NV caps and vcpu flags Marc Zyngier
2025-02-20 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] KVM: arm64: NV userspace ABI Joey Gouly
2025-02-24 19:52 ` (subset) " Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220140323.GA2562076@e124191.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox