From: Akshay Behl <akshaybehl231@gmail.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrew.jones@linux.dev, cleger@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com,
Akshay Behl <akshaybehl231@gmail.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] riscv: Refactor SBI FWFT lock tests
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:02:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250320173235.16547-1-akshaybehl231@gmail.com> (raw)
This patch adds a generic function for lock tests for all
the sbi fwft features. It expects the feature is already
locked before being called and tests the locked feature.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Behl <akshaybehl231@gmail.com>
---
v3:
- Fixed indentation.
- Removed unnecessary comments.
- Added locked prefix.
v2:
- Made changes to handel non boolean feature tests.
riscv/sbi-fwft.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/riscv/sbi-fwft.c b/riscv/sbi-fwft.c
index 581cbf6b..c4d0b170 100644
--- a/riscv/sbi-fwft.c
+++ b/riscv/sbi-fwft.c
@@ -74,6 +74,37 @@ static void fwft_check_reset(uint32_t feature, unsigned long reset)
sbiret_report(&ret, SBI_SUCCESS, reset, "resets to %lu", reset);
}
+/* Must be called after locking the feature using SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK */
+static void fwft_feature_lock_test_values(uint32_t feature, size_t nr_values,
+ unsigned long test_values[], unsigned long locked_value)
+{
+ struct sbiret ret;
+
+ report_prefix_push("locked");
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < nr_values; ++i) {
+ ret = fwft_set(feature, test_values[i], 0);
+ sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED,
+ "Set to %lu without lock flag", test_values[i]);
+
+ ret = fwft_set(feature, test_values[i], SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK);
+ sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED,
+ "Set to %lu with lock flag", test_values[i]);
+ }
+
+ ret = fwft_get(feature);
+ sbiret_report(&ret, SBI_SUCCESS, locked_value,
+ "Get value %lu", locked_value);
+
+ report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+static void fwft_feature_lock_test(uint32_t feature, unsigned long locked_value)
+{
+ unsigned long values[] = {0, 1};
+ fwft_feature_lock_test_values(feature, 2, values, locked_value);
+}
+
static void fwft_check_base(void)
{
report_prefix_push("base");
@@ -181,11 +212,8 @@ static void fwft_check_misaligned_exc_deleg(void)
/* Lock the feature */
ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_set(0, SBI_FWFT_SET_FLAG_LOCK);
sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_SUCCESS, "Set misaligned deleg feature value 0 and lock");
- ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_set(1, 0);
- sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED,
- "Set locked misaligned deleg feature to new value");
- ret = fwft_misaligned_exc_get();
- sbiret_report(&ret, SBI_SUCCESS, 0, "Get misaligned deleg locked value 0");
+
+ fwft_feature_lock_test(SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG, 0);
report_prefix_pop();
}
@@ -326,17 +354,7 @@ adue_inval_tests:
else
enabled = !enabled;
- ret = fwft_set(SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING, !enabled, 0);
- sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED, "set locked to %d without lock", !enabled);
-
- ret = fwft_set(SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING, !enabled, 1);
- sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED, "set locked to %d with lock", !enabled);
-
- ret = fwft_set(SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING, enabled, 0);
- sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED, "set locked to %d without lock", enabled);
-
- ret = fwft_set(SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING, enabled, 1);
- sbiret_report_error(&ret, SBI_ERR_DENIED_LOCKED, "set locked to %d with lock", enabled);
+ fwft_feature_lock_test(SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING, enabled);
adue_done:
install_exception_handler(EXC_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT, NULL);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 17:32 Akshay Behl [this message]
2025-03-21 10:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] riscv: Refactor SBI FWFT lock tests Andrew Jones
2025-03-22 10:46 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250320173235.16547-1-akshaybehl231@gmail.com \
--to=akshaybehl231@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox