From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Chandra Merla <cmerla@redhat.com>,
Stable@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: don't allocate/assign airqs for non-existing queues
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 04:34:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407042058-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b187710-329d-4d36-b2e7-158709ea60d6@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:17:10AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 07.04.25 09:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 05:39:10PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not perfect, but AFAIKS, not horrible.
> > >
> > > It is like it is. QEMU does queue exist if the corresponding feature
> > > is offered by the device, and that is what we have to live with.
> >
> > I don't think we can live with this properly though.
> > It means a guest that does not know about some features
> > does not know where to find things.
>
> Please describe a real scenario, I'm missing the point.
OK so.
Device has VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT and VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING
Driver only knows about VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING so
it does not know what does VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT do.
How does it know which vq to use for reporting?
It will try to use the free page hint one.
> Whoever adds new feat_X *must be aware* about all previous features,
> otherwise we'd be reusing feature bits and everything falls to pieces.
The knowledge is supposed be limited to which feature bit to use.
> >
> > So now, I am inclined to add linux code to work with current qemu and
> > with spec compliant one, and add qemu code to work with current linux
> > and spec compliant one.
> >
> > Document the bug in the spec, maybe, in a non conformance section.
>
> I'm afraid this results in a lot of churn without really making things
> better.
> IMHO, documenting things how they actually behave, and maybe moving towards
> fixed queue indexes for new features is the low hanging fruit.
I worry about how to we ensure that?
If old code is messed up people will just keep propagating that.
I would like to fix old code so that new code is correct.
>
> As raised, it's not just qemu+linux, it's *at least* also cloud-hypervisor.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
There's a slippery slope here in that people will come to us
with buggy devices and ask to change the spec.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 20:36 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: don't allocate/assign airqs for non-existing queues David Hildenbrand
2025-04-03 9:44 ` Thomas Huth
2025-04-03 12:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-04-03 12:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-03 13:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-04-03 14:18 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-03 14:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 4:36 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-04 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 10:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 13:36 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-04 13:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 14:00 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-04 14:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 15:39 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-04 16:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-04 17:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 7:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 8:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-04-07 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 8:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 8:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 9:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 13:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 17:39 ` Daniel Verkamp
2025-04-07 18:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 21:09 ` Daniel Verkamp
2025-04-09 11:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 21:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-09 10:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-09 10:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-09 11:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-09 12:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-09 12:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-09 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 9:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 13:12 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-07 13:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 13:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2025-04-07 13:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 17:26 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-07 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 8:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 8:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 8:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-06 18:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 7:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-07 8:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-07 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-06 15:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-03 14:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-04 4:02 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-04 5:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-04-04 12:05 ` Halil Pasic
2025-04-10 18:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-11 11:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-04-11 12:42 ` Heiko Carstens
2025-04-11 12:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2025-04-11 13:34 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407042058-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cmerla@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).