Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] sched/wait: Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority()
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 21:18:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250520191816.GJ16434@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250519185514.2678456-9-seanjc@google.com>

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:55:10AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Drop the setting of WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() to
> differentiate it from add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive().  The one and
> only user add_wait_queue_priority(), Xen privcmd's irqfd_wakeup(),
> unconditionally returns '0', i.e. doesn't actually operate in exclusive
> mode.

I find:

drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c:      add_wait_queue_priority(wqh, &irqfd->irqfd_wait);
drivers/xen/privcmd.c:  add_wait_queue_priority(wqh, &kirqfd->wait);

I mean, it might still be true and all, but hyperv seems to also use
this now.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-19 18:55 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: Make irqfd registration globally unique Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: Use a local struct to do the initial vfs_poll() on an irqfd Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: Acquire SCRU lock outside of irqfds.lock during assignment Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: Initialize irqfd waitqueue callback when adding to the queue Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: Add irqfd to KVM's list via the vfs_poll() callback Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: Add irqfd to eventfd's waitqueue while holding irqfds.lock Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters Sean Christopherson
2025-05-20 19:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-20 20:57     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: Disallow binding multiple irqfds to an eventfd with a priority waiter Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] sched/wait: Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() Sean Christopherson
2025-05-20 19:18   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-05-20 22:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-21 11:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-05-21 14:44         ` Michael Kelley
2025-05-21 15:05           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-21 13:22       ` Jürgen Groß
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: Drop sanity check that per-VM list of irqfds is unique Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: selftests: Assert that eventfd() succeeds in Xen shinfo test Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add utilities to create eventfds and do KVM_IRQFD Sean Christopherson
2025-05-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: selftests: Add a KVM_IRQFD test to verify uniqueness requirements Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250520191816.GJ16434@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox