From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: "Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 08/14] riscv: misaligned: declare misaligned_access_speed under CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:43:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529-84d9bececfab561dfc68b723@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250523101932.1594077-9-cleger@rivosinc.com>
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 12:19:25PM +0200, Clément Léger wrote:
> While misaligned_access_speed was defined in a file compile with
> CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED, its definition was under
> CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED. This resulted in compilation problems
> when using it in a file compiled with CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED.
>
> Move the declaration under CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED so that it can be
> used unconditionnally when compiled with that config and remove the check
> for that variable in traps_misaligned.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 5 ++++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index dbe5970d4fe6..2bfa4ef383ed 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ int cpu_online_unaligned_access_init(unsigned int cpu);
> #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_SCALAR_MISALIGNED)
> void unaligned_emulation_finish(void);
> bool unaligned_ctl_available(void);
> -DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
> #else
> static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
> {
> @@ -80,6 +79,10 @@ static inline bool unaligned_ctl_available(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED)
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, misaligned_access_speed);
> +#endif
> +
> bool __init check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void);
> #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_VECTOR_MISALIGNED)
> void check_vector_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *work __always_unused);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> index 34b4a4e9dfca..f1b2af515592 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> @@ -369,9 +369,7 @@ static int handle_scalar_misaligned_load(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS, 1, regs, addr);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> *this_cpu_ptr(&misaligned_access_speed) = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_EMULATED;
> -#endif
>
> if (!unaligned_enabled)
> return -1;
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 10:19 [PATCH v8 00/14] riscv: add SBI FWFT misaligned exception delegation support Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] riscv: sbi: add Firmware Feature (FWFT) SBI extensions definitions Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] riscv: sbi: remove useless parenthesis Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] riscv: sbi: add new SBI error mappings Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] riscv: sbi: add FWFT extension interface Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] riscv: sbi: add SBI FWFT extension calls Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] riscv: misaligned: request misaligned exception from SBI Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] riscv: misaligned: use on_each_cpu() for scalar misaligned access probing Clément Léger
2025-05-23 18:37 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] riscv: misaligned: declare misaligned_access_speed under CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED Clément Léger
2025-05-23 18:36 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-05-29 12:43 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] riscv: misaligned: move emulated access uniformity check in a function Clément Léger
2025-05-23 18:30 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-05-23 19:21 ` Clément Léger
2025-05-26 8:41 ` Andrew Jones
2025-05-26 9:38 ` Clément Léger
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] riscv: misaligned: add a function to check misalign trap delegability Clément Léger
2025-05-23 18:39 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] RISC-V: KVM: add SBI extension init()/deinit() functions Clément Léger
2025-06-12 13:24 ` Anup Patel
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] RISC-V: KVM: add SBI extension reset callback Clément Léger
2025-06-12 13:24 ` Anup Patel
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] RISC-V: KVM: add support for FWFT SBI extension Clément Léger
2025-05-23 13:05 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-05-23 15:29 ` Clément Léger
2025-05-23 16:27 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-05-23 18:02 ` Atish Patra
2025-05-23 19:23 ` Clément Léger
2025-05-26 8:58 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-06-12 13:25 ` Anup Patel
2025-05-23 10:19 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] RISC-V: KVM: add support for SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_DELEG Clément Léger
2025-05-23 13:08 ` Radim Krčmář
2025-06-12 13:26 ` Anup Patel
2025-06-04 18:02 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] riscv: add SBI FWFT misaligned exception delegation support Palmer Dabbelt
2025-06-04 19:32 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-06-05 7:12 ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-06-05 1:30 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2025-08-10 21:12 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250529-84d9bececfab561dfc68b723@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=cleger@rivosinc.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).