From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F9F296147 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750774210; cv=none; b=jXHGnAbzhMQ+ZI4CiGtSfH2OTnR+BlwgWpNkfRwdg2vqc5J3gUi42P7TLEb8L3d60ZUvdYKyfqk2tx1RV55tPHTzVsYJEqgeu908XLsTfXrjeoahFDx5mTTBCkmnLdATpSHRgYUo79/OuNcHwnK7czUv0QnBysWQNVhChdIk3w0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750774210; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qj/CWqHLyhMEEnGdAVi2FKgDX7NQhEFCDAoqdAeRp2o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=T7IlbxcRN1b7PuuOB1Zq640D2bjNJf6IMntBZqnmvqiBWs+qdFti3bShMQlXIiRKnyr5cSGnBBNi9PsrThbqY/BXFOp0VbVNzzzvo20k7Y+vKkqFkUSLfUsGUCt7DnFOlIUhvKfeOUuN0DdqHbVj1Qi21r1fpIn1W3YZ6iHD4a8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ventanamicro.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ventanamicro.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ventanamicro.com header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.b=Xi27Plsy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ventanamicro.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ventanamicro.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ventanamicro.com header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.b="Xi27Plsy" Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-450cfb79177so3088135e9.0 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:10:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; t=1750774207; x=1751379007; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MQ7CvyZIlkZs87gjY0NM1qz59baVwPwR/W8k37uo164=; b=Xi27PlsyZzSlZ1Hm5UeBtd4XfHF2eUXlrtvOhE/GTof2j8pvV7qU+ulra0manN8uhx SxgEXA1rUtksBTYFws/XJZxJ77ccb0I5fFvOxi7DJLciG6036XIpeYiO0FoSc3W04W6j BgXwyal62Tkb2ouuNDFpJAh2omVWlBw2iLk/7qa/fna46KUZm1t5l0UqvUsPuSL2Gzrf ltiTPj4uRrkL3DABeWm7whb2Sztia4kDmPPZwj6/sbnQbv6cU/2qcJ4QXoRz/Qc/fC5R QgzEfVymKOklYE1rPbn9ynPS7g7Xg6ID6NnCLAuC7oM7q69Wei256jJuOe6Ugr5OEZMB UUAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750774207; x=1751379007; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MQ7CvyZIlkZs87gjY0NM1qz59baVwPwR/W8k37uo164=; b=a9tnNtptiZw6Ek2ImGW1se+dg9iZsAnztFm2EhfQjQhCE9vtvQnJpq0XJVn2vBacf0 qLgFZWix/lhmqErq6uvjbd71GLdC4Ra8iPyuvUx3G7TE3yn9YQYgs+Gh0yY+XfWPc1mM gr+tJbZ+801RDXbnZUiWx70ZyDsrYPOKHCAmPJnR0ZjqIyug069/Od/8UVTe6CSxEzP1 l1QuHozsVFBQt25YI/BJVXVe5AWuOM1YtwOlAqYQU4F7OBU3rtJoUIIFtG9WCqAf0/5t k5KMVYXTjsgHh9giwUrvGrlJmQlU4SE3Z0Cs4kcKB26HRPM60JNwfiHnW2Ga1UT/KdEh MP1A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWbuyzKj4ubDroMX0zG2jMpJXOBV+x4atu85C3bLiIeFXAOYoS20NS2cn5pCFoUlv6Mook=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx3IsGd6F31JuJaThTu0zkuOXrN9ZPwDYqZNzogKz3tBDJs40Zt N6gH7gyh9fUyCmhSQ7mXtYPJ1IGGj5LNhSWJyAMtC1GyjxcOAHUEFlnVmnaUveE8N8E= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuvYx9h+iJDv6R8BAMAhrKp41XHv2MsZFwMAvimQjB+8//+07embwO++F/ZilM G8LLMZ+T3dikVP719cHF8ZTJKGC2hn8D0nCw/PeN0x37a4/jdSxp+oe4rqxpy+dRuLW4MGsMS6Z OtZvDFRKevQD3v9V1tsgCErEDGJYMUCLe9pAifqlxu+X0N3SGBDYoKAjbNY8vaIIBevyuYVkc1y jZAC3165b6R3MtigdW2wnHxp5GhhjsJ6PMSU1TMnd7ELUn7rhysFPGXwMcn8zlplbctsZz/LMaj +9CNqNuVXu9eCp2lXbL4KxvkSey571D5kqBYPhOdx1ikhlxJHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJeX4diRkZ29kEnrmPsfhU9TcNr2AZ9X1Thlmc1YkCR6UEhFhLrNxHaOV0+h9u10fRDQFJlw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3b24:b0:453:c39:d0a7 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-453653cf416mr150568745e9.5.1750774206936; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8308:a00c:e200::5485]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6e81106b8sm2090841f8f.91.2025.06.24.07.10.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:10:04 +0200 From: Andrew Jones To: zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn Cc: anup@brainfault.org, atishp@atishpatra.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add common supported test cases Message-ID: <20250624-d7b4b9ba702fcaf2f42695b1@orel> References: <7e8f1272337e8d03851fd3bb7f6fc739e604309e.1749810736.git.zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7e8f1272337e8d03851fd3bb7f6fc739e604309e.1749810736.git.zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:30:13PM +0800, zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn wrote: > From: Quan Zhou > > Some common KVM test cases are supported on riscv now as following: > > access_tracking_perf_test > demand_paging_test > dirty_log_perf_test > dirty_log_test > guest_print_test > kvm_binary_stats_test > kvm_create_max_vcpus > kvm_page_table_test > memslot_modification_stress_test > memslot_perf_test > rseq_test > set_memory_region_test Half this list is already build for riscv since they're common. See TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON. If the other half can be built and run then please send a separate patch, not something tacked onto this series, since they're all unrelated to the series. > > Add missing headers for tests and fix RISCV_FENCE redefinition > in `rseq-riscv.h` by using the existing macro from . > > Signed-off-by: Quan Zhou > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 12 ++++++++++++ > .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h | 2 ++ > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h | 3 +-- > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm > index 38b95998e1e6..565e191e99c8 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm > @@ -197,6 +197,18 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += arch_timer > TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += coalesced_io_test > TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += get-reg-list > TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += steal_time > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += access_tracking_perf_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += demand_paging_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += dirty_log_perf_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += dirty_log_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += guest_print_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_binary_stats_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_create_max_vcpus > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += kvm_page_table_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += memslot_modification_stress_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += memslot_perf_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += rseq_test > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += set_memory_region_test > > TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch += coalesced_io_test > TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch += demand_paging_test > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h > index 162f303d9daa..4cf5ae11760f 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h > @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > #include "kvm_util.h" > +#include "ucall_common.h" These should be included directly from the tests that need them. > > #define INSN_OPCODE_MASK 0x007c > #define INSN_OPCODE_SHIFT 2 > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h > index 67d544aaa9a3..06c840e81c8b 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-riscv.h > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > * exception when executed in all modes. > */ > #include > +#include > > #if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? (__BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN) : defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) > #define RSEQ_SIG 0xf1401073 /* csrr mhartid, x0 */ > @@ -24,8 +25,6 @@ > #define REG_L __REG_SEL("ld ", "lw ") > #define REG_S __REG_SEL("sd ", "sw ") > > -#define RISCV_FENCE(p, s) \ > - __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence " #p "," #s : : : "memory") > #define rseq_smp_mb() RISCV_FENCE(rw, rw) > #define rseq_smp_rmb() RISCV_FENCE(r, r) > #define rseq_smp_wmb() RISCV_FENCE(w, w) > -- > 2.34.1 tools/testing/selftests/rseq isn't under KVM's purview, so this should be a separate patch CC'ing the appropriate people and lists. Thanks, drew