public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:09:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916180958.GA1797871@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911183307.1910-2-alifm@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:32:58AM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
> The current reset process saves the device's config space state before
> reset and restores it afterward. However, when a device is in an error
> state before reset, config space reads may return error values instead of
> valid data. This results in saving corrupted values that get written back
> to the device during state restoration.
> 
> Avoid saving the state of the config space when the device is in error.
> While restoring we only restorei the state that can be restored through
> kernel data such as BARs or doesn't depend on the saved state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci.c      | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c |  5 +++++
>  drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c |  5 +++++
>  drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c |  5 +++++
>  drivers/pci/tph.c      |  5 +++++
>  drivers/pci/vc.c       |  5 +++++
>  6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index b0f4d98036cd..4b67d22faf0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1720,6 +1720,11 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	struct pci_cap_saved_state *save_state;
>  	u16 *cap;
>  
> +	if (!dev->state_saved) {
> +		pci_warn(dev, "Not restoring pcie state, no saved state");
> +		return;

Seems like a lot of messages.  If we want to warn about this, why
don't we do it once in pci_restore_state()?

I guess you're making some judgment about what things can be restored
even when !dev->state_saved.  That seems kind of hard to maintain in
the future as other capabilities are added.

Also seems sort of questionable if we restore partial state and keep
using the device as if all is well.  Won't the device be in some kind
of inconsistent, unpredictable state then?

Bjorn

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11 18:32 [PATCH v3 00/10] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] PCI: Avoid saving error values for config space Farhan Ali
2025-09-13  8:27   ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-15 17:15     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16 18:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-09-16 20:00     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-19 18:17       ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-11 18:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2025-09-12 12:23   ` Benjamin Block
2025-09-12 17:19     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16  6:52   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-16 18:37     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-17  6:21       ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-17 17:50         ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2025-09-17 14:48   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-17 17:22     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] s390/pci: Restore IRQ unconditionally for the zPCI device Farhan Ali
2025-09-15  8:39   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-15 17:42     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16 10:59       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2025-09-15  9:22   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2025-09-15 11:42   ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-15 18:12     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-16 10:54       ` Niklas Schnelle
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2025-09-13  9:04   ` Alex Williamson
2025-09-15 18:27     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-15  6:26   ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-09-15 18:27     ` Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2025-09-11 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250916180958.GA1797871@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox