From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
dongsheng <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: selftests: Add timing_info bit support in vmx_pmu_caps_test
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:45:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250919004512.1359828-2-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250919004512.1359828-1-seanjc@google.com>
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
A new bit PERF_CAPABILITIES[17] called "PEBS_TIMING_INFO" bit is added
to indicated if PEBS supports to record timing information in a new
"Retried Latency" field.
Since KVM requires user can only set host consistent PEBS capabilities,
otherwise the PERF_CAPABILITIES setting would fail, add pebs_timing_info
into the "immutable_caps" to block host inconsistent PEBS configuration
and cause errors.
Opportunistically drop the anythread_deprecated bit. It isn't and likely
never was a PERF_CAPABILITIES flag, the test's definition snuck in when
the union was copy+pasted from the kernel's definition.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>
[sean: call out anythread_deprecated change]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
index a1f5ff45d518..f8deea220156 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_pmu_caps_test.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static union perf_capabilities {
u64 pebs_baseline:1;
u64 perf_metrics:1;
u64 pebs_output_pt_available:1;
- u64 anythread_deprecated:1;
+ u64 pebs_timing_info:1;
};
u64 capabilities;
} host_cap;
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static const union perf_capabilities immutable_caps = {
.pebs_arch_reg = 1,
.pebs_format = -1,
.pebs_baseline = 1,
+ .pebs_timing_info = 1,
};
static const union perf_capabilities format_caps = {
--
2.51.0.470.ga7dc726c21-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 0:45 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: selftests: PMU fixes for GNR/SRF/CWF Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 0:45 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-09-19 0:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: selftests: Track unavailable_mask for PMU events as 32-bit value Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 5:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-19 14:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 0:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: selftests: Reduce number of "unavailable PMU events" combos tested Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 5:44 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-19 0:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: selftests: Validate more arch-events in pmu_counters_test Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 0:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: selftests: Handle Intel Atom errata that leads to PMU event overcount Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 5:49 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-19 14:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 16:42 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250919004512.1359828-2-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox