public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] KVM: selftests: Move all PTE accesses into nested_create_pte()
Date: Wed,  1 Oct 2025 14:58:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251001145816.1414855-10-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001145816.1414855-1-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>

From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>

In preparation for making the nested mapping functions work for NPT,
move all logic that directly accesses the PTE into nested_create_pte(),
as these accesses will be different for SVM.

Stop using struct eptPageTableEntry in the caller, instead pass a
uint64_t pointer (and add an assertion on the size to make sure it stays
correct).

Calculate whether or not an EPT entry is a leaf in __nested_pg_map(),
and return the address from nested_create_pte() to __nested_pg_map().
Also, set the access and dirty bits in nested_create_pte() for leaf
entries. This matches the current behavior and removes all direct
accesses to the EPT entry from __nested_pg_map().

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c | 69 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c
index 673756b27e903..b0e6267eac806 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/vmx.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct eptPageTableEntry {
 	uint64_t ignored_62_52:11;
 	uint64_t suppress_ve:1;
 };
+kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct eptPageTableEntry) == sizeof(uint64_t));
 
 struct eptPageTablePointer {
 	uint64_t memory_type:3;
@@ -42,6 +43,8 @@ struct eptPageTablePointer {
 	uint64_t address:40;
 	uint64_t reserved_63_52:12;
 };
+kvm_static_assert(sizeof(struct eptPageTablePointer) == sizeof(uint64_t));
+
 int vcpu_enable_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	uint16_t evmcs_ver;
@@ -362,35 +365,46 @@ void prepare_vmcs(struct vmx_pages *vmx, void *guest_rip, void *guest_rsp)
 	init_vmcs_guest_state(guest_rip, guest_rsp);
 }
 
-static void nested_create_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm,
-			      struct eptPageTableEntry *pte,
-			      uint64_t nested_paddr,
-			      uint64_t paddr,
-			      int current_level,
-			      int target_level)
+static uint64_t nested_create_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm,
+				  uint64_t *pte,
+				  uint64_t nested_paddr,
+				  uint64_t paddr,
+				  int level,
+				  bool leaf)
 {
-	if (!pte->readable) {
-		pte->writable = true;
-		pte->readable = true;
-		pte->executable = true;
-		pte->page_size = (current_level == target_level);
-		if (pte->page_size)
-			pte->address = paddr >> vm->page_shift;
+	struct eptPageTableEntry *epte = (struct eptPageTableEntry *)pte;
+
+	if (!epte->readable) {
+		epte->writable = true;
+		epte->readable = true;
+		epte->executable = true;
+		epte->page_size = leaf;
+
+		if (leaf)
+			epte->address = paddr >> vm->page_shift;
 		else
-			pte->address = vm_alloc_page_table(vm) >> vm->page_shift;
+			epte->address = vm_alloc_page_table(vm) >> vm->page_shift;
+
+		/*
+		 * For now mark these as accessed and dirty because the only
+		 * testcase we have needs that.  Can be reconsidered later.
+		 */
+		epte->accessed = leaf;
+		epte->dirty = leaf;
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Entry already present.  Assert that the caller doesn't want a
 		 * leaf entry at this level, and that there isn't a leaf entry
 		 * at this level.
 		 */
-		TEST_ASSERT(current_level != target_level,
+		TEST_ASSERT(!leaf,
 			    "Cannot create leaf entry at level: %u, nested_paddr: 0x%lx",
-			    current_level, nested_paddr);
-		TEST_ASSERT(!pte->page_size,
+			    level, nested_paddr);
+		TEST_ASSERT(!epte->page_size,
 			    "Leaf entry already exists at level: %u, nested_paddr: 0x%lx",
-			    current_level, nested_paddr);
+			    level, nested_paddr);
 	}
+	return epte->address;
 }
 
 
@@ -398,8 +412,9 @@ void __nested_pg_map(void *root_hva, struct kvm_vm *vm,
 		     uint64_t nested_paddr, uint64_t paddr, int target_level)
 {
 	const uint64_t page_size = PG_LEVEL_SIZE(target_level);
-	struct eptPageTableEntry *pt = root_hva, *pte;
-	uint16_t index;
+	uint64_t *pt = root_hva, *pte;
+	uint16_t index, address;
+	bool leaf;
 
 	TEST_ASSERT(vm->mode == VM_MODE_PXXV48_4K, "Attempt to use "
 		    "unknown or unsupported guest mode, mode: 0x%x", vm->mode);
@@ -427,22 +442,16 @@ void __nested_pg_map(void *root_hva, struct kvm_vm *vm,
 	for (int level = PG_LEVEL_512G; level >= PG_LEVEL_4K; level--) {
 		index = (nested_paddr >> PG_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & 0x1ffu;
 		pte = &pt[index];
+		leaf = (level == target_level);
 
-		nested_create_pte(vm, pte, nested_paddr, paddr, level, target_level);
+		address = nested_create_pte(vm, pte, nested_paddr, paddr, level, leaf);
 
-		if (pte->page_size)
+		if (leaf)
 			break;
 
-		pt = addr_gpa2hva(vm, pte->address * vm->page_size);
+		pt = addr_gpa2hva(vm, address * vm->page_size);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * For now mark these as accessed and dirty because the only
-	 * testcase we have needs that.  Can be reconsidered later.
-	 */
-	pte->accessed = true;
-	pte->dirty = true;
-
 }
 
 void nested_pg_map(void *root_hva, struct kvm_vm *vm,
-- 
2.51.0.618.g983fd99d29-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-01 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-01 14:58 [PATCH 00/12] Extend test coverage for nested SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: selftests: Minor improvements to asserts in test_vmx_nested_state() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 21:44   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_set_nested_state_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:40   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-09 23:13     ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_close_while_nested_test " Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:44   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test " Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:51   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-09 23:19     ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: selftests: Remove invalid CR3 test from vmx_tsc_adjust_test Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:55   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-09 23:24     ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_tsc_adjust_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 23:27   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: selftests: Pass the root HVA directly to nested mapping functions Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 23:30   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: selftests: Use 'leaf' instead of hugepage to describe EPT entries Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 18:34   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-13 21:41   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 22:25     ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 22:58       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 23:13         ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-15 18:20           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2025-10-13 18:41   ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: selftests: Move all PTE accesses into nested_create_pte() Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: selftests: Move EPT-specific init outside nested_create_pte() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 18:52   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: selftests: Refactor generic nested mapping outside VMX code Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 19:04   ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_dirty_log_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 17:37 ` [PATCH 00/12] Extend test coverage for nested SVM Yosry Ahmed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251001145816.1414855-10-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox