From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test to cover SVM
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 14:58:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251001145816.1414855-5-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001145816.1414855-1-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Add SVM L1 code to run the nested guest, and allow the test to run with
SVM as well as VMX.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 2 +-
...aling_test.c => nested_tsc_scaling_test.c} | 48 +++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
rename tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/{vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c => nested_tsc_scaling_test.c} (83%)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index 61c6abdc9b36f..dc68147ace97f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/vmx_msrs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/vmx_invalid_nested_guest_state
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/set_nested_state_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/vmx_tsc_adjust_test
-TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/nested_tsc_scaling_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/apic_bus_clock_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/xapic_ipi_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += x86/xapic_state_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
similarity index 83%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
index 1759fa5cb3f29..56ab91544775f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/nested_tsc_scaling_test.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include "kvm_util.h"
#include "vmx.h"
+#include "svm_util.h"
#include "kselftest.h"
/* L2 is scaled up (from L1's perspective) by this factor */
@@ -79,7 +80,30 @@ static void l2_guest_code(void)
__asm__ __volatile__("vmcall");
}
-static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)
+static void l1_svm_code(struct svm_test_data *svm)
+{
+ unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE];
+
+ /* check that L1's frequency looks alright before launching L2 */
+ check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L1);
+
+ generic_svm_setup(svm, l2_guest_code,
+ &l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE]);
+
+ /* enable TSC scaling for L2 */
+ wrmsr(MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO, (L2_SCALE_FACTOR << 32) | 1);
+
+ /* launch L2 */
+ run_guest(svm->vmcb, svm->vmcb_gpa);
+ GUEST_ASSERT(svm->vmcb->control.exit_code == SVM_EXIT_VMMCALL);
+
+ /* check that L1's frequency still looks good */
+ check_tsc_freq(UCHECK_L1);
+
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void l1_vmx_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)
{
unsigned long l2_guest_stack[L2_GUEST_STACK_SIZE];
uint32_t control;
@@ -116,11 +140,19 @@ static void l1_guest_code(struct vmx_pages *vmx_pages)
GUEST_DONE();
}
+static void l1_guest_code(void *data)
+{
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX))
+ l1_vmx_code(data);
+ else
+ l1_svm_code(data);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
- vm_vaddr_t vmx_pages_gva;
+ vm_vaddr_t guest_gva = 0;
uint64_t tsc_start, tsc_end;
uint64_t tsc_khz;
@@ -129,7 +161,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
uint64_t l1_tsc_freq = 0;
uint64_t l2_tsc_freq = 0;
- TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX));
+ TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX) ||
+ kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SVM));
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_TSC_CONTROL));
TEST_REQUIRE(sys_clocksource_is_based_on_tsc());
@@ -152,8 +185,13 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
printf("real TSC frequency is around: %"PRIu64"\n", l0_tsc_freq);
vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, l1_guest_code);
- vcpu_alloc_vmx(vm, &vmx_pages_gva);
- vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, vmx_pages_gva);
+
+ if (kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX))
+ vcpu_alloc_vmx(vm, &guest_gva);
+ else
+ vcpu_alloc_svm(vm, &guest_gva);
+
+ vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, guest_gva);
tsc_khz = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_GET_TSC_KHZ, NULL);
TEST_ASSERT(tsc_khz != -1, "vcpu ioctl KVM_GET_TSC_KHZ failed");
--
2.51.0.618.g983fd99d29-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-01 14:58 [PATCH 00/12] Extend test coverage for nested SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: selftests: Minor improvements to asserts in test_vmx_nested_state() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 21:44 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_set_nested_state_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:40 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-09 23:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_close_while_nested_test " Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:44 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2025-10-09 22:51 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test " Jim Mattson
2025-10-09 23:19 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: selftests: Remove invalid CR3 test from vmx_tsc_adjust_test Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 22:55 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-09 23:24 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_tsc_adjust_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 23:27 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: selftests: Pass the root HVA directly to nested mapping functions Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-09 23:30 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: selftests: Use 'leaf' instead of hugepage to describe EPT entries Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 18:34 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-13 21:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 22:25 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 22:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-13 23:13 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-15 18:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: selftests: Move all PTE accesses into nested_create_pte() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 18:41 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: selftests: Move EPT-specific init outside nested_create_pte() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 18:52 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: selftests: Refactor generic nested mapping outside VMX code Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-13 19:04 ` Jim Mattson
2025-10-01 14:58 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_dirty_log_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-01 17:37 ` [PATCH 00/12] Extend test coverage for nested SVM Yosry Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251001145816.1414855-5-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox