From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Fix the interaction between SMM and the asynchronous pagefault
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 23:32:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251015033258.50974-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251015033258.50974-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Currently a #SMI can cause KVM to drop an #APF ready event and
subsequently causes the guest to never resume the task that is waiting
for it.
This can result in tasks becoming permanently stuck within the guest.
This happens because KVM flushes the APF queue without notifying the guest
of completed APF requests when the guest exits to real mode.
And the SMM exit code calls kvm_set_cr0 with CR.PE == 0, which triggers
this code.
It must be noted that while this flush is reasonable to do for the actual
real mode entry, it is actually achieves nothing because it is too late to
flush this queue on SMM exit.
To fix this, avoid doing this flush altogether, and handle the real
mode entry/exits in the same way KVM already handles the APIC
enable/disable events:
APF completion events are not injected while APIC is disabled,
and once APIC is re-enabled, KVM raises the KVM_REQ_APF_READY request
which causes the first pending #APF ready event to be injected prior
to entry to the guest mode.
This change also has the side benefit of preserving #APF events if the
guest temporarily enters real mode - for example, to call firmware -
although such usage should be extermery rare in modern operating systems.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 0fc7171ced26..ec96328634ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1046,6 +1046,13 @@ bool kvm_require_dr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int dr)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM_INTERNAL(kvm_require_dr);
+static bool kvm_pv_async_pf_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ u64 mask = KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED | KVM_ASYNC_PF_DELIVERY_AS_INT;
+
+ return (vcpu->arch.apf.msr_en_val & mask) == mask;
+}
+
static inline u64 pdptr_rsvd_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return vcpu->arch.reserved_gpa_bits | rsvd_bits(5, 8) | rsvd_bits(1, 2);
@@ -1138,15 +1145,17 @@ void kvm_post_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long old_cr0, unsigned lon
}
if ((cr0 ^ old_cr0) & X86_CR0_PG) {
- kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
- kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(vcpu);
-
/*
* Clearing CR0.PG is defined to flush the TLB from the guest's
* perspective.
*/
if (!(cr0 & X86_CR0_PG))
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GUEST, vcpu);
+ /*
+ * Re-check APF completion events, when the guest re-enables paging.
+ */
+ else if (kvm_pv_async_pf_enabled(vcpu))
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APF_READY, vcpu);
}
if ((cr0 ^ old_cr0) & KVM_MMU_CR0_ROLE_BITS)
@@ -3651,13 +3660,6 @@ static int set_msr_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
return 0;
}
-static inline bool kvm_pv_async_pf_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- u64 mask = KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED | KVM_ASYNC_PF_DELIVERY_AS_INT;
-
- return (vcpu->arch.apf.msr_en_val & mask) == mask;
-}
-
static int kvm_pv_enable_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
{
gpa_t gpa = data & ~0x3f;
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-15 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 3:32 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix a lost async pagefault notification when the guest is using SMM Maxim Levitsky
2025-10-15 3:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Warn if KVM tries to deliver an #APF completion when APF is not enabled Maxim Levitsky
2025-10-15 3:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: Fix a semi theoretical bug in kvm_arch_async_page_present_queued Maxim Levitsky
2025-10-15 3:32 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2025-11-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix a lost async pagefault notification when the guest is using SMM Sean Christopherson
2025-11-10 18:19 ` mlevitsk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251015033258.50974-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox