From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sinmsgout01.his.huawei.com (sinmsgout01.his.huawei.com [119.8.177.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064FF26F2B9 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=119.8.177.36 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768228869; cv=none; b=XFZHkIoYbXEC75Gl9MCYxANLrXFcj8TP9kAWoo9WVipi0TXQbP6yf4+c1sx1L93MqbN0D2xSnpacFYm2CkbYTeOpU2l/eC+TbOF1m64nr9v3VvCETlfpZDSm1aI1OtKhSHI2fS/a3HT2TEWb2s0qea8SQ4n3TrDxQUy9V3YlUKk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768228869; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6UKMqyK90yAWNvvXvu5Wkmuf2i8c9iHwuYZLkjvBtu4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=UNurHum4qPNhmgEvi/hnh26t+/v7f79TeGSGfVJ+fUJLDkW84JqhS1hdv+D7INpcXtHjkzB8yYPyHK/GeX4g5w99gPxwunQFrRcC1MHme6vdC0W9zsKrP7cbhy07cWSX9UdBrXZhAcP+AlCPPiUEtemfLIUhKkXE6b6JMT0grR0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=MMHPZ50S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=119.8.177.36 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="MMHPZ50S" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=sQenP0CxwuCsGNI/69y3lS7YAYOZsk9pBINwUTYU7PI=; b=MMHPZ50SetuI/WO9k9oFpO5oheOMvKWMguXiiaA445jiamZTZBYbwwj0W8KG69uAd4f8B/Zot Q0cH3R3s/oDcM5NrOjeIY9pFvHmEFPFR0DCnzlyPXppHLofDpTgUMunPHS5HWfX+29H1MO0PTlz gUMPbBCv4ueCI75t1ZawqrM= Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.146.33]) by sinmsgout01.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dqZkQ1hlrz1P6nM; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:38:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.150]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dqZmy5YBjzJ46BH; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:40:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.146.113]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4950A40563; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 22:41:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:41:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:41:00 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Sascha Bischoff CC: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , nd , "maz@kernel.org" , "oliver.upton@linux.dev" , Joey Gouly , Suzuki Poulose , "yuzenghui@huawei.com" , "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "lpieralisi@kernel.org" , Timothy Hayes Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add ARM_VGIC_V5 device to KVM headers Message-ID: <20260112144100.00007cda@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20260109170400.1585048-8-sascha.bischoff@arm.com> References: <20260109170400.1585048-1-sascha.bischoff@arm.com> <20260109170400.1585048-8-sascha.bischoff@arm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500011.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.215) To dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:04:41 +0000 Sascha Bischoff wrote: > This is the base GICv5 device which is to be used with the > KVM_CREATE_DEVICE ioctl to create a GICv5-based vgic. > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff Mostly so I don't bother reading it in a potential v4 and because it's obviously fine. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron