From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sinmsgout03.his.huawei.com (sinmsgout03.his.huawei.com [119.8.177.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF862FA0DD for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=119.8.177.38 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768235410; cv=none; b=Qxli2GCO3/vuaUwyMlkoyHpCyPYLcsu9IGpNwEPJCBWvKSok/4MYFhTqiCcffQHdi3rdGPPCfFH2ofRk4VZtbXxoWHKeJ7//dMxQQjA/si+YgDnYGEhtfy6ehLJCn6VPErbZzThYL/RuZxtk5Sife4WSz40DhuhjuN9bOkVO5zo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768235410; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vuE7L+1uXxM/QNh0tjk6FPVUYyh8IZQbH/76jG+2pf8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hA0YbvoQGRnPmkA2qXKxMSthjWSWi81gUEf0blv0fC12d6F06clhZIgRE6NKrrri0TlgqW0bq0k3iPqn0pSlofEofzhQRUULGf6FhSdFRmiXPKpgidtoH7+RcaxkTEyovCVTTzd8eNPl09R4g1Kr2jGiNbTTZZ4mkVUPJ0AbuFI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=W6pHH4qs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=119.8.177.38 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="W6pHH4qs" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=iumCkYZyOeqq6qA1Zq+gU2yZ5NWDLFCQDfxsLa8JXpo=; b=W6pHH4qsg6b29YAavzGeAAMkopao0UbaBSN1XIMkAOrRDLQVPGo39SIphHV6p6s1K8ykyunYn ur2TEBelhEkRjE/8KA2W+G/ySQTAJ00ieinUVu/SBgKTVvJYRgOjWEMDWH/B9x0V5lu5FmqX/rE 8nCEO5kg3wQWX2S5kqW0H60= Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.146.32]) by sinmsgout03.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dqd8H2Jp1zMpPg; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:27:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.83]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dqdBW449PzHnGfQ; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:29:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.214.146.113]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D766E40569; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:29:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.15) by dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.36; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:29:55 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:29:54 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Sascha Bischoff CC: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , nd , "maz@kernel.org" , "oliver.upton@linux.dev" , Joey Gouly , Suzuki Poulose , "yuzenghui@huawei.com" , "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "lpieralisi@kernel.org" , Timothy Hayes Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 30/36] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Introduce kvm_arm_vgic_v5_ops and register them Message-ID: <20260112162954.00002020@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20260109170400.1585048-31-sascha.bischoff@arm.com> References: <20260109170400.1585048-1-sascha.bischoff@arm.com> <20260109170400.1585048-31-sascha.bischoff@arm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To dubpeml100005.china.huawei.com (7.214.146.113) On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:04:48 +0000 Sascha Bischoff wrote: > Only the KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL->KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT op is > currently supported. All other ops are stubbed out. > > Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes > Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes > Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron