public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: Syzkaller nested_run_pending defense
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:48:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260312234823.3120658-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)

Stop playing a losing game of whack-a-mole with syzkaller over
nested_run_pending, and simply treat the flag as "untrusted" if userspace gains
control of the vCPU.  I.e. don't WARN if userspace _may_ have stuffed vCPU
state to force an impossible VM-Exit.

The signal:noise ratio for nested_run_pending WARNs when syzkaller is fuzzing
nVMX/nSVM is awful, and playing whack-a-mole with syzkaller is doing more harm
that good at this point.  While it's possible syzkaller could find an actual
KVM bug by stuffing vCPU state, if the _only_ symptom is the nested_run_pending
WARN, then in theory the bug should also be hittable by stuffing L2 state prior
to nested VM-Enter.

v2:
 - Put the state transition in kvm_x86_vcpu_pre_run(). [Yosry]
 - Add Yosry's review.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260310224546.2582118-1-seanjc@google.com

Sean Christopherson (1):
  KVM: x86: Suppress WARNs on nested_run_pending after userspace exit

Yosry Ahmed (1):
  KVM: x86: Move nested_run_pending to kvm_vcpu_arch

 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 15 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c       | 23 ++++++++-------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c          | 16 +++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h          |  4 ---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c       | 50 +++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c          | 16 +++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h          |  3 --
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              |  7 +++++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.h              | 10 +++++++
 9 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)


base-commit: bfd7f4adc1230373c25e1b787a6f1ee407eb0656
-- 
2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-12 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-12 23:48 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-03-12 23:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Move nested_run_pending to kvm_vcpu_arch Sean Christopherson
2026-03-12 23:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Suppress WARNs on nested_run_pending after userspace exit Sean Christopherson
2026-04-08  0:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86: Syzkaller nested_run_pending defense Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260312234823.3120658-1-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yosry@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox