public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: vsie: Avoid injecting machine check on signal
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:07:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260316130702.17080Dcf-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d291035f-8bf1-493c-a629-5852a1e65caa@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 01:35:59PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 16.03.26 um 13:25 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> I guess we should still add something like
> 
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> @@ -1123,6 +1123,7 @@ static int do_vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page, struc
>         struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb_s = &vsie_page->scb_s;
>         struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb_o = vsie_page->scb_o;
>         int guest_bp_isolation;
> +       int sie_return = SIE64_RETURN_OK;
>         int rc = 0;
>         handle_last_fault(vcpu, vsie_page, sg);
> @@ -1163,7 +1164,7 @@ static int do_vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page, struc
>                         goto xfer_to_guest_mode_check;
>                 }
>                 guest_timing_enter_irqoff();
> -               rc = kvm_s390_enter_exit_sie(scb_s, vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs, sg->asce.val);
> +               sie_return = kvm_s390_enter_exit_sie(scb_s, vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs, sg->asce.val);
>                 guest_timing_exit_irqoff();
>                 local_irq_enable();
>         }
> @@ -1178,7 +1179,7 @@ static int do_vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page, struc
>         kvm_vcpu_srcu_read_lock(vcpu);
> -       if (rc == SIE64_RETURN_MCCK) {
> +       if (sie_return == SIE64_RETURN_MCCK) {
>                 kvm_s390_reinject_machine_check(vcpu, &vsie_page->mcck_info);
>                 return 0;

Yes, this looks better and makes the code more understandable.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 12:25 [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: vsie: Avoid injecting machine check on signal Christian Borntraeger
2026-03-16 12:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-03-16 13:07   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-03-16 13:05 ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260316130702.17080Dcf-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox