Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: s390: selftests: enable some common memory-related tests

[Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>]

On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 05:01:34PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> Enable the following tests on s390:
> * memslot_modification_stress_test
> * memslot_perf_test
> * mmu_stress_test
> 
> Since the first two tests are now supported on all architectures, move
> them into TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON and out of the indiviual architectures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> index fdec90e85467..057f17d6b896 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON += kvm_binary_stats_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON += kvm_page_table_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON += set_memory_region_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON += memslot_modification_stress_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON += memslot_perf_test
>  
>  # Compiled test targets
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 = $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON)
> @@ -147,8 +149,6 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += coalesced_io_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += dirty_log_perf_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += guest_memfd_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += hardware_disable_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += memslot_modification_stress_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += memslot_perf_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += mmu_stress_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += rseq_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86 += steal_time
> @@ -186,8 +186,6 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += coalesced_io_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += dirty_log_memslot_perf_testperf_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += get-reg-list
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += guest_memfd_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += memslot_modification_stress_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += memslot_perf_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += mmu_stress_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += rseq_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += steal_time
> @@ -205,6 +203,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/ucontrol_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/user_operexec
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/keyop
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += rseq_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += mmu_stress_test
>  
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv = $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON)
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += riscv/sbi_pmu_test
> @@ -214,8 +213,6 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += arch_timer
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += coalesced_io_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += dirty_log_perf_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += get-reg-list
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += memslot_modification_stress_test
> -TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += memslot_perf_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += mmu_stress_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += rseq_test
>  TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += steal_time
> -- 

I think you missed removing the loongarch targets.

	Steffen