public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Wake-up from WFI when iqrchip is in userspace
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:36:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423163607.486345-1-maz@kernel.org> (raw)

It appears that there is nothing in the wake-up path that
evaluates whether the in-kernel interrupts are pending unless
we have a vgic.

This means that the userspace irqchip support has been broken for
about four years, and nobody noticed. It was also broken before
as we wouldn't wake-up on a PMU interrupt, but hey, who cares...

It is probably time to remove the feature altogether, because it
was a terrible idea 10 years ago, and it still is.

Fixes: b57de4ffd7c6d ("KVM: arm64: Simplify kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer()")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 176cbe8baad30..8bb2c7422cc8b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -824,6 +824,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
 {
 	bool irq_lines = *vcpu_hcr(v) & (HCR_VI | HCR_VF | HCR_VSE);
 
+	irq_lines |= (!irqchip_in_kernel(v->kvm) &&
+		      (kvm_timer_should_notify_user(v) ||
+		       kvm_pmu_should_notify_user(v)));
+
 	return ((irq_lines || kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(v))
 		&& !kvm_arm_vcpu_stopped(v) && !v->arch.pause);
 }
-- 
2.47.3


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-04-23 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260423163607.486345-1-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox