From: Matt Evans <mattev@meta.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio/pci: Set up bar resources and maps in vfio_pci_core_enable()
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:25:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423182517.2286030-2-mattev@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423182517.2286030-1-mattev@meta.com>
Previously BAR resource requests and the corresponding pci_iomap()
were performed on-demand and without synchronisation, which was racy.
Rather than add synchronisation, it's simplest to address this by
doing both activities from vfio_pci_core_enable().
The resource allocation and/or pci_iomap() can still fail; their
status is tracked and existing calls to vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap()
will fail in the same way as before. This keeps the point of failure
as observed by userspace the same, i.e. failures to request/map unused
BARs are benign.
Fixes: 7f5764e179c6 ("vfio: use vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap to map bar in mmap")
Fixes: 0d77ed3589ac0 ("vfio/pci: Pull BAR mapping setup from read-write path")
Signed-off-by: Matt Evans <mattev@meta.com>
---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c | 29 ++++++---------
include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
index 3f8d093aacf8..c59c61861d81 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
@@ -482,6 +482,55 @@ static int vfio_pci_core_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+static void __vfio_pci_core_unmap_bars(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ int bar = i + PCI_STD_RESOURCES;
+
+ if (vdev->barmap[bar])
+ pci_iounmap(pdev, vdev->barmap[bar]);
+ if (vdev->have_bar_resource[bar])
+ pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, 1 << bar);
+ vdev->barmap[bar] = NULL;
+ vdev->have_bar_resource[bar] = false;
+ }
+}
+
+static void __vfio_pci_core_map_bars(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Eager-request BAR resources, and iomap; soft failures are
+ * allowed, and consumers must check before use.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ int ret;
+ int bar = i + PCI_STD_RESOURCES;
+ void __iomem *io;
+
+ if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = pci_request_selected_regions(pdev, 1 << bar, "vfio");
+ if (ret) {
+ pci_warn(vdev->pdev, "Failed to reserve region %d\n", bar);
+ continue;
+ }
+ vdev->have_bar_resource[bar] = true;
+
+ io = pci_iomap(pdev, bar, 0);
+ if (io)
+ vdev->barmap[bar] = io;
+ else
+ pci_warn(vdev->pdev, "Failed to iomap region %d\n", bar);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* The pci-driver core runtime PM routines always save the device state
* before going into suspended state. If the device is going into low power
@@ -568,6 +617,7 @@ int vfio_pci_core_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
if (!vfio_vga_disabled() && vfio_pci_is_vga(pdev))
vdev->has_vga = true;
+ __vfio_pci_core_map_bars(vdev);
return 0;
@@ -591,7 +641,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
struct vfio_pci_dummy_resource *dummy_res, *tmp;
struct vfio_pci_ioeventfd *ioeventfd, *ioeventfd_tmp;
- int i, bar;
+ int i;
/* For needs_reset */
lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->vdev.dev_set->lock);
@@ -646,14 +696,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_disable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
vfio_config_free(vdev);
- for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
- bar = i + PCI_STD_RESOURCES;
- if (!vdev->barmap[bar])
- continue;
- pci_iounmap(pdev, vdev->barmap[bar]);
- pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, 1 << bar);
- vdev->barmap[bar] = NULL;
- }
+ __vfio_pci_core_unmap_bars(vdev);
list_for_each_entry_safe(dummy_res, tmp,
&vdev->dummy_resources_list, res_next) {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
index 4251ee03e146..bf7152316db4 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
@@ -200,25 +200,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_do_io_rw);
int vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int bar)
{
- struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
- int ret;
- void __iomem *io;
-
- if (vdev->barmap[bar])
- return 0;
-
- ret = pci_request_selected_regions(pdev, 1 << bar, "vfio");
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- io = pci_iomap(pdev, bar, 0);
- if (!io) {
- pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, 1 << bar);
+ /*
+ * The barmap is now always set up in vfio_pci_core_enable().
+ * Some legacy callers use this function to ensure the BAR
+ * resources are requested, and others to ensure the
+ * pci_iomap() was done, so check here:
+ */
+ if (bar < 0 || bar >= PCI_STD_NUM_BARS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (vdev->barmap[bar] == 0)
return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- vdev->barmap[bar] = io;
-
+ if (!vdev->bar_has_rsrc[bar])
+ return -EBUSY;
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap);
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
index 2ebba746c18f..1f508b067d82 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device {
const struct vfio_pci_device_ops *pci_ops;
void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
+ bool have_bar_resource[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS];
u8 *pci_config_map;
u8 *vconfig;
struct perm_bits *msi_perm;
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 18:25 [PATCH v2 0/3] vfio/pci: Request resources and map BARs at enable time Matt Evans
2026-04-23 18:25 ` Matt Evans [this message]
2026-04-23 21:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio/pci: Set up bar resources and maps in vfio_pci_core_enable() Alex Williamson
2026-04-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] vfio/pci: Replace vfio_pci_core_setup_barmap() with checks for resource/map Matt Evans
2026-04-23 21:30 ` Alex Williamson
2026-04-23 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] vfio/pci: Check BAR resources before exporting a DMABUF Matt Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260423182517.2286030-2-mattev@meta.com \
--to=mattev@meta.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox