Re: [PATCH 11/43] KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Make VPEs valid in vgic_v5_reset()

Marc Zyngier
2026-04-30T09:37:42Z

On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:09:47 +0100,
Sascha Bischoff <Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com> wrote:
>
> When resetting VPEs, also mark them as valid in the VM VPE Table. This
> is required as it informs the IRS that a specific VPE may be made
> resident, and without this the IRS will treat the VPE as invalid.
>
> As part of this change, we also introduce a wrapper around the VPE
> doorbells - vgic_v5_send_command(). This takes a struct kvm_vcpu
> pointer, and the command to run, and triggers the function bound to
> the command via that vcpu's doorbell. This is a convenience function
> to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v5.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v5.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v5.c
> index 0649729f6b834..92bb63b6dd6bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v5.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v5.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,18 @@ static int vgic_v5_irs_vpe_cr0_update(int vm_id, int vpe_id, u32 cr0)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int vgic_v5_send_command(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + enum gicv5_vcpu_info_cmd_type type)
> +{
> + struct gicv5_cmd_info cmd_info;
> +
> + if (!vcpu)
> + return -EINVAL;

Drop this. If we must crash, let's crash early, in the most
spectacular way, and leaving a backtrace. Trying to gracefully handle
this stuff is making it harder to track and debug such problems.

Also, if we made it that far, it is very likely that vcpu isn't NULL.

> +
> + cmd_info.cmd_type = type;
> + return irq_set_vcpu_affinity(vgic_v5_vpe_db(vcpu), &cmd_info);
> +}
> +
> static int vgic_v5_db_set_vcpu_affinity(struct irq_data *data, void *vcpu_info)
> {
> struct vgic_v5_vm *vm = data->domain->host_data;
> @@ -691,6 +703,8 @@ static void vgic_v5_teardown_per_vm_domain(struct vgic_v5_vm *vm)
>
> void vgic_v5_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + int rc;
> +
> /*
> * We always present 16-bits of ID space to the guest, irrespective of
> * the host allowing more.
> @@ -702,6 +716,14 @@ void vgic_v5_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * CPUIF (but potentially fewer in the IRS).
> */
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.num_pri_bits = 5;
> +
> + /* Make the VPE valid in the VPET */
> + rc = vgic_v5_send_command(vcpu, VPE_MAKE_VALID);
> + if (rc) {

nit: rc serves no purpose here. Just write it as:

if (vgic_v5_send_command(...))

> + /* We can't continue, so mark the VM as dead */
> + kvm_vm_dead(vcpu->kvm);
> + return;

But we probably should dump some traces here, rather than silently
mark the VM as fsck'd. THis is the sign that something has gone very
wrong.

Thanks,

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.