From: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Gao Chao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fall back to IRR scan when PIR is empty despite PID.ON being set
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:03:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260428070349.1633238-1-chenyi.qiang@intel.com> (raw)
Fall back to kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr() in vmx_sync_pir_to_irr() when
PID.ON is set but PIR turns out to be empty, to correctly report the
highest pending interrupt from the existing IRR.
In a nested VM stress test, the following WARNING fires in
vmx_check_nested_events() when kvm_cpu_has_interrupt() reports a pending
interrupt but the subsequent kvm_apic_has_interrupt() (which invokes
vmx_sync_pir_to_irr() again) returns -1:
WARNING: CPU: 99 PID: 57767 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:4449 vmx_check_nested_events+0x6bf/0x6e0 [kvm_intel]
Call Trace:
kvm_check_and_inject_events
vcpu_enter_guest.constprop.0
vcpu_run
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run
kvm_vcpu_ioctl
__x64_sys_ioctl
do_syscall_64
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
The root cause is a race between vmx_sync_pir_to_irr() on the target vCPU
and __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt() on a sender vCPU. The sender
performs two individually-atomic operations that are not a single
transaction:
1. pi_test_and_set_pir(vector) -- sets the PIR bit
2. pi_test_and_set_on() -- sets PID.ON
The following interleaving triggers the bug:
Sender vCPU (IPI): Target vCPU (1st sync_pir_to_irr):
B1: set PIR[vector]
A1: pi_clear_on()
A2: pi_harvest_pir() -> sees B1 bit
A3: xchg() -> consumes bit, PIR=0
(1st sync returns correct max_irr)
B2: set PID.ON = 1
Target vCPU (2nd sync_pir_to_irr):
C1: pi_test_on() -> TRUE (from B2)
C2: pi_clear_on() -> ON=0
C3: pi_harvest_pir() -> PIR empty
C4: *max_irr = -1, early return
IRR NOT SCANNED
The interrupt is not lost (it resides in the IRR from the first sync and
is recovered on the next vcpu_enter_guest() iteration), but the incorrect
max_irr causes a spurious WARNING and a wasted L2 VM-Enter/VM-Exit cycle.
Fixes: b41f8638b9d3 ("KVM: VMX: Isolate pure loads from atomic XCHG when processing PIR")
Reported-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:Claude Opus 4.6
Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
---
There is a WARNING call trace during a nested VM stress test. AI
provided an analysis of a race condition and the related fix, which
looks reasonable to me. With the patch applied, the WARNING can not
be reproduced in overnight stress testing.
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 8b24e682535b..e2da29371e00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -7153,6 +7153,16 @@ int vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
smp_mb__after_atomic();
got_posted_interrupt =
kvm_apic_update_irr(vcpu, vt->pi_desc.pir, &max_irr);
+ /*
+ * If PID.ON was set but PIR is empty, another CPU may have
+ * set PID.ON via __vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt() after a
+ * previous sync already consumed the PIR bits. In this
+ * case, kvm_apic_update_irr() will not have scanned the
+ * existing IRR, so fall back to scanning the IRR directly
+ * to correctly report the highest pending interrupt.
+ */
+ if (max_irr == -1)
+ max_irr = kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu);
} else {
max_irr = kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu);
got_posted_interrupt = false;
--
2.43.5
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 7:03 Chenyi Qiang [this message]
2026-04-28 7:45 ` [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fall back to IRR scan when PIR is empty despite PID.ON being set Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 8:27 ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-04-28 15:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-29 1:08 ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-04-29 12:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-28 11:10 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260428070349.1633238-1-chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--to=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox