From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: d.riley@proxmox.com, jon@nutanix.com
Subject: [PATCH 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: separate more EPT/non-EPT permission_fault()
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 21:52:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505195226.563317-9-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505195226.563317-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Move more of EPT handling entirely in the existing "if (!ept)"
conditional. Use a new "rf" variable instead of uf for read permissions
for clarity.
Merge smepf and ff into a single variable because EPT's "SMEP" (actually
MBEC) is defined differently and does not need smepf.
Tested-by: David Riley <d.riley@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index d94a488db79d..fc34536c536b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5584,24 +5584,28 @@ static void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, bool ept)
* that causes a fault with the given PFEC.
*/
+ /* Faults from reads to non-readable pages */
+ u8 rf = 0;
/* Faults from writes to non-writable pages */
u8 wf = (pfec & PFERR_WRITE_MASK) ? (u8)~w : 0;
/* Faults from user mode accesses to supervisor pages */
- u8 uf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? (u8)~u : 0;
- /* Faults from fetches of non-executable pages*/
- u8 ff = (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? (u8)~x : 0;
- /* Faults from kernel mode fetches of user pages */
- u8 smepf = 0;
+ u8 uf = 0;
+ /* Faults from fetches of non-executable pages */
+ u8 ff = 0;
/* Faults from kernel mode accesses of user pages */
u8 smapf = 0;
- if (!ept) {
+ if (ept) {
+ rf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? (u8)~u : 0;
+ ff = (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? (u8)~x : 0;
+ } else {
/* Faults from kernel mode accesses to user pages */
u8 kf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? 0 : u;
- /* Not really needed: !nx will cause pte.nx to fault */
- if (!efer_nx)
- ff = 0;
+ uf = (pfec & PFERR_USER_MASK) ? (u8)~u : 0;
+
+ if (efer_nx)
+ ff = (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? (u8)~x : 0;
/* Allow supervisor writes if !cr0.wp */
if (!cr0_wp)
@@ -5609,7 +5613,7 @@ static void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, bool ept)
/* Disallow supervisor fetches of user code if cr4.smep */
if (cr4_smep)
- smepf = (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? kf : 0;
+ ff |= (pfec & PFERR_FETCH_MASK) ? kf : 0;
/*
* SMAP:kernel-mode data accesses from user-mode
@@ -5630,7 +5634,7 @@ static void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, bool ept)
smapf = (pfec & (PFERR_RSVD_MASK|PFERR_FETCH_MASK)) ? 0 : kf;
}
- mmu->permissions[index] = ff | uf | wf | smepf | smapf;
+ mmu->permissions[index] = ff | uf | wf | rf | smapf;
}
}
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 19:51 [PATCH v6 00/28] KVM: combined patchset for MBEC/GMET support Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:51 ` [PATCH 01/28] KVM: TDX/VMX: rework EPT_VIOLATION_EXEC_FOR_RING3_LIN into PROT_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: remove SPTE_PERM_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 03/28] KVM: x86/mmu: free up bit 10 of PTEs in preparation for MBEC Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: shuffle high bits of SPTEs " Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 05/28] KVM: x86/mmu: remove SPTE_EPT_* Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 06/28] KVM: x86/mmu: merge make_spte_{non,}executable Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: rename and clarify BYTE_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: introduce ACC_READ_MASK Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: pass PFERR_GUEST_PAGE/FINAL_MASK to kvm_translate_gpa Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: pass pte_access for final nGPA->GPA walk Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 12/28] KVM: x86: make translate_nested_gpa vendor-specific Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: split XS/XU bits for EPT Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: move cr4_smep to base role Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 15/28] KVM: VMX: enable use of MBEC Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 16/28] KVM: nVMX: pass advanced EPT violation vmexit info to guest Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 17/28] KVM: nVMX: pass PFERR_USER_MASK to MMU on EPT violations Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 18/28] KVM: x86/mmu: add support for MBEC to EPT page table walks Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 19/28] KVM: nVMX: advertise MBEC to nested guests Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 20/28] KVM: nVMX: allow MBEC with EVMCS Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: propagate access mask from root pages down Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: introduce cpu_role bit for availability of PFEC.I/D Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 23/28] KVM: SVM: add GMET bit definitions Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: hard code more bits in kvm_init_shadow_npt_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: add support for GMET to NPT page table walks Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 26/28] KVM: SVM: enable GMET and set it in MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 27/28] KVM: SVM: work around errata 1218 Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-05 19:52 ` [PATCH 28/28] KVM: nSVM: enable GMET for guests Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-30 15:07 [PATCH v5 00/28] KVM: combined patchset for MBEC/GMET support Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-30 15:07 ` [PATCH 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: separate more EPT/non-EPT permission_fault() Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-30 18:35 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505195226.563317-9-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=d.riley@proxmox.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox