From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, kas@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
yan.y.zhao@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: TDX: Rename tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to show it's for leaf SPTEs
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 15:57:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260509075719.4338-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509075201.4077-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Rename tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to tdx_sept_remove_leaf_spte() to
clearly show that this function is for removal of leaf SPTEs.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
---
MMU_refactors v2:
- New patch.
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 749883fb8f11..5a7f304e14af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -1764,8 +1764,8 @@ static void tdx_track(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE);
}
-static int tdx_sept_remove_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
- enum pg_level level, u64 old_spte)
+static int tdx_sept_remove_leaf_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
+ enum pg_level level, u64 old_spte)
{
struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm);
kvm_pfn_t pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
@@ -1838,7 +1838,7 @@ static int tdx_sept_set_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 old_spte,
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
if (is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
- return tdx_sept_remove_private_spte(kvm, gfn, level, old_spte);
+ return tdx_sept_remove_leaf_spte(kvm, gfn, level, old_spte);
if (KVM_BUG_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte), kvm))
return -EIO;
@@ -2834,7 +2834,7 @@ void tdx_flush_tlb_current(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void tdx_flush_tlb_all(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
/*
- * TDX has called tdx_track() in tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to
+ * TDX has called tdx_track() in tdx_sept_remove_leaf_spte() to
* ensure that private EPT will be flushed on the next TD enter. No need
* to call tdx_track() here again even when this callback is a result of
* zapping private EPT.
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-09 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 7:52 [PATCH v2 00/15] TDX MMU refactors Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.link_external_spt() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: TDX: Wrap mapping of leaf and non-leaf S-EPT entries into helpers Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Fold set_external_spte_present() into its sole caller Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb param "old_spte" into kvm_x86_ops.set_external_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: TDX: Move KVM_BUG_ON()s in __tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic() to TDX code Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: TDX: Move lockdep assert " Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Morph !is_frozen_spte() check into a KVM_MMU_WARN_ON() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Plumb "sp" _pointer_ into the TDP MMU's handle_changed_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Centrally propagate to-present/atomic zap updates to external PTEs Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop KVM_BUG_ON() on shared lock to zap child " Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: TDX: Hoist tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() above set_private_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: TDX: Drop kvm_x86_ops.remove_external_spte() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Move error handling inside free_external_spt() Yan Zhao
2026-05-09 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: TDX: Move external page table freeing to TDX code Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260509075719.4338-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox