From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Bezdeka, Florian" <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>
Cc: "tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"jmattson@google.com" <jmattson@google.com>,
"rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"binbin.wu@intel.com" <binbin.wu@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"bonzini@redhat.com" <bonzini@redhat.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"rpm@xenomai.org" <rpm@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526102143.GD4149641@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ae24df3f3a62957ca997c6788926fd212f074b3.camel@siemens.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:01:41AM +0000, Bezdeka, Florian wrote:
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL)
> > +/*
> > + * On VMX, NMIs and IRQs (as configured by KVM) are acknowledged by hardware as
> > + * part of the VM-Exit, i.e. the event itself is consumed as part the VM-Exit.
> > + * x86_entry_from_kvm() is invoked by KVM to effectively forward NMIs and IRQs
> > + * to the kernel for servicing. On SVM, a.k.a. AMD, the NMI/IRQ VM-Exit is
> > + * purely a signal that an NMI/IRQ is pending, i.e. the event that triggered
> > + * the VM-Exit is held pending until it's unblocked in the host.
> > + */
> > +noinstr void x86_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int event_type, unsigned int vector)
> > +{
> > + if (event_type == EVENT_TYPE_EXTINT) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > + /*
> > + * Use FRED dispatch, even when running IDT. The dispatch
> > + * tables are kept in sync between FRED and IDT, and the FRED
> > + * dispatch works well with CFI.
> > + */
> > + fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
>
> Seems this landed in 7.1-rc5.
>
> I'm seeing a build failure here:
>
> arch/x86/entry/common.c: In function ‘x86_entry_from_kvm’:
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:27:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fred_entry_from_kvm’; did you mean ‘idt_entry_from_kvm’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 27 | fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | idt_entry_from_kvm
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:50:24: error: ‘return’ with a value, in function returning void [-Wreturn-mismatch]
> 50 | return fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:18:14: note: declared here
> 18 | noinstr void x86_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int event_type, unsigned int vector)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> > +#else
> > + idt_entry_from_kvm(vector);
> > +#endif
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(event_type != EVENT_TYPE_NMI);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED))
> > + return fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Notably, we must use IDT dispatch for NMI when running in IDT mode.
> > + * The FRED NMI context is significantly different and will not work
> > + * right (speficially FRED fixed the NMI recursion issue).
> > + */
> > + idt_entry_from_kvm(vector);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM(x86_entry_from_kvm);
> > +#endif
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > @@ -97,4 +97,6 @@ static __always_inline void arch_exit_to
> > }
> > #define arch_exit_to_user_mode arch_exit_to_user_mode
> >
> > +extern void x86_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int entry_type, unsigned int vector);
> > +
> > #endif
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fred.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fred.h
> > @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long fre
> > static inline void cpu_init_fred_exceptions(void) { }
> > static inline void cpu_init_fred_rsps(void) { }
> > static inline void fred_complete_exception_setup(void) { }
> > -static inline void fred_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int type, unsigned int vector) { }
>
> That seems still necessary for the !CONFIG_X86_FRED case.
The thing is, KVM_INTEL should force X86_FRED, I'm not sure how you can
have both KVM_INTEL and !X86_FRED, that should be an invalid config.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 15:56 [PATCH 0/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix VMX interrupt injection vs hrtimer_rearm_deferred() Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 17:54 ` Xin Li
2026-04-28 9:43 ` Binbin Wu
2026-04-28 11:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-01 20:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 " Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 2:54 ` Yan Zhao
2026-05-08 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 6:09 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-08 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 8:56 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-08 9:18 ` [PATCH v3 " Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 9:41 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-12 22:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-18 8:12 ` Zhao Liu
2026-05-20 23:06 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-05-26 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-26 19:35 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-05-26 10:01 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2026-05-26 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-26 10:42 ` Florian Bezdeka
2026-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix VMX vs hrtimer_rearm_deferred() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 12:59 ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-12 22:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15 18:15 ` Marc Dionne
2026-05-18 8:01 ` Zhao Liu
2026-05-18 8:16 ` Binbin Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526102143.GD4149641@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=binbin.wu@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox