Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
To: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<berrange@redhat.com>, <armbru@redhat.com>,
	<pankaj.gupta@amd.com>, <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	<xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	<david@kernel.org>, <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
	<ackerleytng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 05/12] system/memory: Re-use memory-backend-guest-memfd inode for private memory
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 19:03:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528000416.8161-6-michael.roth@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528000416.8161-1-michael.roth@amd.com>

When convert-in-place=true, the shared memory allocated/provided by the
guest-memfd memory backend should also be used internally for private
memory. Do this by dup()'ing the guest_memfd FD so separate cleanup
paths for shared vs. private FDs can be managed in the same way they are
currently for convert-in-place=false (where shared memory comes from
some other backend like memory-backend-memfd).

Since it only currently makes sense to allow a
memory-backend-guest-memfd FD to be used for private memory, introduce a
new RAM_GUEST_MEMFD_SHARED flag that can be used to limit dup()'ing to
specific backend types like memory-backend-guest-memfd.

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
---
 backends/hostmem-guest-memfd.c |  1 +
 include/system/memory.h        |  3 +++
 system/physmem.c               | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/backends/hostmem-guest-memfd.c b/backends/hostmem-guest-memfd.c
index deb796a6bd..8ab8242892 100644
--- a/backends/hostmem-guest-memfd.c
+++ b/backends/hostmem-guest-memfd.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ have_fd:
     ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : RAM_PRIVATE;
     ram_flags |= backend->reserve ? 0 : RAM_NORESERVE;
     ram_flags |= backend->guest_memfd ? RAM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0;
+    ram_flags |= RAM_GUEST_MEMFD_SHARED;
     return memory_region_init_ram_from_fd(&backend->mr, OBJECT(backend), name,
                                           backend->size, ram_flags, fd, 0, errp);
 }
diff --git a/include/system/memory.h b/include/system/memory.h
index 24c68720aa..0a371b686a 100644
--- a/include/system/memory.h
+++ b/include/system/memory.h
@@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ typedef struct IOMMUTLBEvent {
  */
 #define RAM_PRIVATE (1 << 13)
 
+/* RAM can be shared that has kvm guest memfd backend */
+#define RAM_GUEST_MEMFD_SHARED   (1 << 14)
+
 static inline void iommu_notifier_init(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUNotify fn,
                                        IOMMUNotifierFlag flags,
                                        hwaddr start, hwaddr end,
diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c
index 04c7c38721..ebec7ae7a4 100644
--- a/system/physmem.c
+++ b/system/physmem.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
 #include "system/hostmem.h"
 #include "system/hw_accel.h"
 #include "system/xen-mapcache.h"
+#include "system/confidential-guest-support.h"
 #include "trace.h"
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FALLOCATE_PUNCH_HOLE
@@ -2187,11 +2188,14 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp)
     if (new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD) {
         int ret;
 
+        assert(current_machine->cgs);
+
         if (!kvm_enabled()) {
             error_setg(errp, "cannot set up private guest memory for %s: KVM required",
                        object_get_typename(OBJECT(current_machine->cgs)));
             goto out_free;
         }
+
         assert(new_block->guest_memfd < 0);
 
         ret = ram_block_coordinated_discard_require(true);
@@ -2202,8 +2206,38 @@ static void ram_block_add(RAMBlock *new_block, Error **errp)
             goto out_free;
         }
 
-        new_block->guest_memfd = kvm_create_guest_memfd_private(new_block->max_length,
-                                                                errp);
+        /*
+         * If both shared/private memory are handled by guest_memfd, make sure to
+         * re-use the guest_memfd inode that should have already been created for
+         * handling shared memory.
+         */
+        if (current_machine->cgs->convert_in_place) {
+            if (!(new_block->flags & RAM_GUEST_MEMFD_SHARED)) {
+                error_setg(errp, "configured memory backend is not compatible with in-place conversion");
+                qemu_mutex_unlock_ramlist();
+                goto out_free;
+            }
+            assert(new_block->fd >= 0);
+
+            /*
+             * Current logic calculates guest_memfd_offset on the assumption that
+             * offset 0 corresponds to the first GPA that is backed by the RAM
+             * block/backend. For cases where the guest_memfd is only used for
+             * private memory and created internally as-needed this is always the
+             * case, but when re-using a guest_memfd that's also usable for shared
+             * memory (e.g. via memory-backend-guest-memfd) it's possible that
+             * guest_memfd might be mmap()'d starting at some non-zero offset. For
+             * now, this isn't a reachable condition, but assert this in case this
+             * ever changes and the logic needs to be updated to account for this.
+             */
+            assert(new_block->fd_offset == 0);
+
+            new_block->guest_memfd = qemu_dup(new_block->fd);
+        } else {
+            new_block->guest_memfd =
+                kvm_create_guest_memfd_private(new_block->max_length, errp);
+        }
+
         if (new_block->guest_memfd < 0) {
             qemu_mutex_unlock_ramlist();
             goto out_free;
@@ -2315,7 +2349,7 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_from_fd(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size,
     assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_PMEM | RAM_NORESERVE |
                           RAM_PROTECTED | RAM_NAMED_FILE | RAM_READONLY |
                           RAM_READONLY_FD | RAM_GUEST_MEMFD |
-                          RAM_RESIZEABLE)) == 0);
+                          RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_GUEST_MEMFD_SHARED)) == 0);
     assert(max_size >= size);
 
     if (xen_enabled()) {
@@ -2828,6 +2862,12 @@ int ram_block_rebind(Error **errp)
 {
     RAMBlock *block;
 
+    if (current_machine->cgs && current_machine->cgs->convert_in_place) {
+        error_setg(errp,
+                   "reset support is not yet enabled for in-place conversion");
+        return -1;
+    }
+
     qemu_mutex_lock_ramlist();
 
     RAMBLOCK_FOREACH(block) {
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28  0:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28  0:03 [PATCH RFC 00/12] guest_memfd: support in-place memory conversion Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] accel/kvm: Decouple guest_memfd checks from memory attribute checks Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] hostmem: Introduce dedicated memory backend for guest_memfd Michael Roth
2026-06-02  8:22   ` Markus Armbruster
2026-06-03  6:19     ` Michael Roth
2026-06-08  8:20       ` Markus Armbruster
2026-06-08 20:42         ` Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] accel/kvm: Add CGS option to control in-place conversion support Michael Roth
2026-06-02  8:23   ` Markus Armbruster
2026-06-03  6:39     ` Michael Roth
2026-06-08  8:15       ` Markus Armbruster
2026-06-08 20:21         ` Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` Michael Roth [this message]
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] system/memory: Default to guest_memfd for RAM for in-place conversion Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] accel/kvm: Move post-conversion updates to a separate helper Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] accel/kvm: Re-order attribute notifications for in-place conversion Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] accel/kvm: Support shared/private conversions via guest_memfd ioctls Michael Roth
2026-06-04 13:19   ` Gupta, Pankaj
2026-06-04 23:36     ` Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] accel/kvm: Don't default to private attributes for in-place conversion Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] i386/sev: Update SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE " Michael Roth
2026-05-28  0:03 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] i386/sev: Allow in-place conversion for SEV-SNP guests Michael Roth
2026-05-28  5:44 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] guest_memfd: support in-place memory conversion Xiaoyao Li
2026-06-02 22:20   ` Michael Roth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260528000416.8161-6-michael.roth@amd.com \
    --to=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox