From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dimitri Daskalakis" <dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/12] PCI: Add Scalable I/O Virtualization data structure definitions
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:23:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604152318.B2BDA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604150153.3619662-11-dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Refactoring of VF routing ID calculation introduces a silent 16-bit truncation that bypasses the maximum bus number bounds check.
--
commit ca9b97e7dff7c499701ce4b55ae9cf14d51bbed7
Author: Dimitri Daskalakis <daskald@meta.com>
PCI: Add Scalable I/O Virtualization data structure definitions
Define the PCIe SIOV extended capability registers per the PCIe 7.0
spec, and introduce the kernel-internal data structures needed to track
SIOV state on a Physical Function. Add an is_siov bit to struct pci_dev
along with helpers to identify SIOV PFs/VFs.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index 45411960fd2ef..fd7c04e26c164 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -683,6 +683,19 @@ struct pci_sriov {
> bool drivers_autoprobe; /* Auto probing of VFs by driver */
> };
>
> +/* Scalable I/O Virtualization */
> +struct pci_siov {
> + struct pci_dev *self; /* This PF */
> + u32 cap; /* SIOV Capabilities */
> + u16 pos; /* Capability position */
> + u16 total_SDIs; /* Total SDIs associated with the PF */
> + u16 num_SDIs; /* Number of SDIs currently enabled */
> + u16 offset; /* First SDI Routing ID offset */
> + u16 stride; /* Following SDI stride */
> + u16 driver_max_SDIs;/* Max num SDIs driver supports */
> + u8 max_SDI_buses; /* Max buses consumed by SDIs */
> +};
> +
[Severity: High]
This patch series relies on the pci_virtfn_routing_id() helper introduced in
an earlier commit ("PCI: Add helper to compute VF Routing ID to pci.h"), but
doesn't this helper introduce a silent truncation issue?
In drivers/pci/pci.h:
static inline u16 pci_virtfn_routing_id(struct pci_dev *pf, u16 offset,
u16 stride, int id)
{
return (pf->bus->number << 8) + pf->devfn + offset + stride * id;
}
If the calculated bus number exceeds 255, the internal calculation exceeds
0xFFFF and is truncated by the u16 return type.
When this is used to determine the bus number in drivers/pci/iov.c:
int pci_iov_virtfn_bus(struct pci_dev *dev, int vf_id)
{
...
return pci_virtfn_routing_id(dev, dev->sriov->offset,
dev->sriov->stride, vf_id) >> 8;
}
The right shift is performed on the truncated 16-bit value, resulting in a
wrapped-around bus number.
Consequently, does this allow the bounds check in sriov_enable() to be
bypassed?
drivers/pci/iov.c:sriov_enable() {
...
bus = pci_iov_virtfn_bus(dev, nr_virtfn - 1);
if (bus > dev->bus->busn_res.end) {
...
}
Because the wrapped-around bus value appears to be within bounds, this could
allow VFs to be enabled on invalid, overlapping bus numbers.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604150153.3619662-1-dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 15:01 [RFC 00/12] PCI: Add support for Scalable I/O Virtualization Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 01/12] PCI: Add helpers to identify SR-IOV PFs/VFs Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 02/12] PCI: Convert iov.c to pci_is_sriov_* helpers Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 03/12] PCI: Convert pci.h " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 04/12] PCI: Convert arch/powerpc " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 05/12] PCI: Convert s390/pci/pci.c " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 06/12] PCI: Convert vfio_pci_core.c " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 07/12] PCI: Convert xen-pciback and pci-driver " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:11 ` Juergen Gross
2026-06-04 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 08/12] PCI: Add is_sriov bit to struct pci_dev Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 09/12] PCI: Add helper to compute VF Routing ID to pci.h Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 10/12] PCI: Add Scalable I/O Virtualization data structure definitions Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 11/12] PCI: Initialize and release SIOV capability Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 12/12] PCI: Reserve bus range for SIOV devices Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 18:20 ` [RFC 00/12] PCI: Add support for Scalable I/O Virtualization Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-04 23:49 ` Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 23:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-05 0:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-05 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604152318.B2BDA1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox