From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dimitri Daskalakis" <dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/12] PCI: Convert xen-pciback and pci-driver to pci_is_sriov_* helpers
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:24:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604152438.510441F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604150153.3619662-8-dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Incomplete implementation: missed conversion of dev->is_virtfn in vpci.c.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent driver unbind can cause a use-after-free of `pcistub_device` in `pci_stub_notifier`.
--
commit 88d02306e6f1bfe4b75d5df018b4e5de4f2ff35a
Author: Dimitri Daskalakis <daskald@meta.com>
PCI: Convert xen-pciback and pci-driver to pci_is_sriov_* helpers
No functional changes.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.7
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Daskalakis <daskald@meta.com>
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message explicitly states its scope is to convert xen-pciback and
pci-driver to the new pci_is_sriov_* helpers. Did we miss converting
dev->is_virtfn in drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c?
For example, in __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev() there are still direct accesses:
drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c:__xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev() {
...
if (!dev->is_virtfn || func) {
...
if (t->dev->is_virtfn && !PCI_FUNC(t->dev->devfn))
...
}
Leaving these direct accesses unconverted means they will fail to distinguish
between SRIOV and SIOV VFs when the helpers are updated to check dev->is_sriov
in later patches.
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> index 79a2b5dfd6941..fd5a13f79fcf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ static int pci_stub_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> if (action != BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> - if (!pdev->is_physfn)
> + if (!pci_is_sriov_physfn(pdev))
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> for (;;) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a use-after-free risk here if a
concurrent unbind occurs?
find_vfs() searches the pcistub_devices list and returns a pcistub_device
pointer without taking a reference count via pcistub_device_get():
drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c:pci_stub_notifier() {
...
for (;;) {
struct pcistub_device *psdev = find_vfs(pdev);
if (!psdev)
break;
device_release_driver(&psdev->dev->dev);
}
...
}
If a concurrent thread unbinds the VF (e.g., via sysfs unbind),
pcistub_remove() executing under the VF's device lock will remove the device
from the list and drop the final reference using pcistub_device_put(), freeing
psdev before the notifier has a chance to execute.
The notifier thread would then dereference the freed psdev memory when
evaluating &psdev->dev->dev in device_release_driver().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260604150153.3619662-1-dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 15:01 [RFC 00/12] PCI: Add support for Scalable I/O Virtualization Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 01/12] PCI: Add helpers to identify SR-IOV PFs/VFs Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 02/12] PCI: Convert iov.c to pci_is_sriov_* helpers Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 03/12] PCI: Convert pci.h " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 04/12] PCI: Convert arch/powerpc " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 05/12] PCI: Convert s390/pci/pci.c " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 06/12] PCI: Convert vfio_pci_core.c " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 07/12] PCI: Convert xen-pciback and pci-driver " Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:11 ` Juergen Gross
2026-06-04 15:24 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 08/12] PCI: Add is_sriov bit to struct pci_dev Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 09/12] PCI: Add helper to compute VF Routing ID to pci.h Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 10/12] PCI: Add Scalable I/O Virtualization data structure definitions Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 11/12] PCI: Initialize and release SIOV capability Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 15:01 ` [RFC 12/12] PCI: Reserve bus range for SIOV devices Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-04 18:20 ` [RFC 00/12] PCI: Add support for Scalable I/O Virtualization Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-04 23:49 ` Dimitri Daskalakis
2026-06-04 23:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-06-05 0:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-05 4:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604152438.510441F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox