From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/34] KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:33:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608153358.DACED1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608145455.89187-5-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Unbounded bitwise shift in `hvclock_to_hz()` triggered by user-controlled input can cause Undefined Behavior (shift out-of-bounds) and a kernel panic (DoS).
- [Low] The KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST ioctls cause compilation failures in userspace due to an incomplete type in the generic UAPI header.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Race condition in `kvm_guest_time_update` reads `kvmclock_offset` unsynchronized, leading to corrupt guest `system_time`.
--
commit fdd3f3e2e20605997654a24ac2e941cc677cf87b
Author: Jack Allister <jalliste@amazon.com>
KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration
This commit adds per-vCPU ioctls (KVM_GET_CLOCK_GUEST and KVM_SET_CLOCK_GUEST)
to allow userspace to precisely save and restore the arithmetic relationship
between the guest TSC and the KVM clock across live migrations.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index d9ef165df6a14..b7e5f6e3dc6c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> +static u64 hvclock_to_hz(u32 mul, s8 shift)
> +{
> + u64 tm = NSEC_PER_SEC << 32;
> +
> + /* Maximise precision. Shift right until the top bit is set */
> + tm <<= 2;
> + shift += 2;
> +
> + /* While 'mul' is even, increase the shift *after* the division */
> + while (!(mul & 1)) {
> + shift++;
> + mul >>= 1;
> + }
> +
> + tm /= mul;
> +
> + if (shift > 0)
> + return tm >> shift;
[Severity: High]
Can this result in an undefined bitwise shift? If userspace provides a
tsc_shift of 32 and a tsc_to_system_mul with 31 trailing zeroes (like
0x80000000), the loop will increment the shift 31 times. This results in a
total shift amount of 65. Since tm is a 64-bit integer, shifting it by 65
bits triggers undefined behavior. Does the validation in
kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_clock_guest() need to enforce a limit on the combined
shift amount?
> + else
> + return tm << -shift;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_clock_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *v, void __user *argp)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * Calculate the guest TSC at the new reference point, and the
> + * corresponding KVM clock value according to user_hv_clock.
> + * Adjust kvmclock_offset so both definitions agree.
> + */
> + guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(v, ka->master_cycle_now);
> + user_clk_ns = __pvclock_read_cycles(&user_hv_clock, guest_tsc);
> + ka->kvmclock_offset = user_clk_ns - ka->master_kernel_ns;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for concurrent updates to
cause a torn read in kvm_guest_time_update() now that this ioctl modifies
kvmclock_offset?
In kvm_guest_time_update(), master_kernel_ns is read safely inside the
pvclock_sc seqcount loop, but kvmclock_offset is read outside of it:
kvm_guest_time_update() {
do {
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&ka->pvclock_sc);
...
master_kernel_ns = ka->master_kernel_ns;
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&ka->pvclock_sc, seq));
...
hv_clock.system_time = kernel_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset;
}
If kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_clock_guest() modifies both variables under the seqcount
write lock after the reader finishes the loop but before reading
kvmclock_offset, couldn't the guest receive a stale kernel_ns combined with a
new kvmclock_offset?
> +
> +out:
> + kvm_end_pvclock_update(kvm);
> + return rc;
> +}
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 6c8afa2047bf3..9b50191b859cd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1669,4 +1669,7 @@ struct kvm_pre_fault_memory {
> __u64 padding[5];
> };
>
> +#define KVM_SET_CLOCK_GUEST _IOW(KVMIO, 0xd6, struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info)
> +#define KVM_GET_CLOCK_GUEST _IOR(KVMIO, 0xd7, struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info)
> +
[Severity: Low]
Does this cause compilation failures for userspace applications? The ioctls
use struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info which is defined in asm/pvclock-abi.h, but
that header is not included by linux/kvm.h. Since UAPI headers should be
self-contained, could this result in an 'invalid application of sizeof to
incomplete type' error?
> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_H */
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608145455.89187-1-dwmw2@infradead.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 14:47 [PATCH v5 00/34] Cleaning up the KVM clock mess David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 01/34] KVM: x86/xen: Do not corrupt KVM clock in kvm_xen_shared_info_init() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 02/34] KVM: x86: Improve accuracy of KVM clock when TSC scaling is in force David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 03/34] UAPI: x86: Move pvclock-abi to UAPI for x86 platforms David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 04/34] KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 15:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 05/34] KVM: selftests: Add KVM/PV clock selftest to prove timer correction David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 15:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 06/34] KVM: x86: Explicitly disable TSC scaling without CONSTANT_TSC David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 07/34] KVM: x86: Activate master clock immediately on vCPU creation David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 16:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 23:29 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 08/34] KVM: x86: Add KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE and fix the documentation on TSC migration David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 16:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 09/34] KVM: x86: Avoid NTP frequency skew for KVM clock on 32-bit host David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 10/34] KVM: x86: Fold __get_kvmclock() into get_kvmclock() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 11/34] KVM: x86: Restructure get_kvmclock() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 12/34] KVM: x86: Fix KVM clock precision in get_kvmclock() with TSC scaling David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 17:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 23:43 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 13/34] KVM: x86: Use get_kvmclock() in kvm_get_wall_clock_epoch() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 14/34] KVM: x86: Fix compute_guest_tsc() to handle negative time deltas David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 17:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:02 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 15/34] KVM: x86: Restructure kvm_guest_time_update() for TSC upscaling David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 18:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 16/34] KVM: x86: Simplify and comment kvm_get_time_scale() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 17/34] KVM: x86: Remove implicit rdtsc() from kvm_compute_l1_tsc_offset() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v5 18/34] KVM: x86: Improve synchronization in kvm_synchronize_tsc() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:14 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 19/34] KVM: x86: Kill last_tsc_{nsec,write,offset} fields David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 18:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:34 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 20/34] KVM: x86: Replace nr_vcpus_matched_tsc count with all_vcpus_matched_tsc bool David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 21/34] KVM: x86: Allow KVM master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 19:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 22/34] KVM: selftests: Add master clock offset test David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 19:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 0:50 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 23/34] KVM: x86: Factor out kvm_use_master_clock() David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 24/34] KVM: x86: Avoid gratuitous global clock updates David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 25/34] KVM: x86/xen: Prevent runstate times from becoming negative David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 19:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:02 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 26/34] KVM: x86: Avoid redundant masterclock updates from multiple vCPUs David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 1:34 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 27/34] KVM: x86: Remove runtime Xen TSC frequency CPUID update David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 28/34] KVM: selftests: Add Xen/generic CPUID timing leaf test David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 0:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 7:02 ` David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 29/34] KVM: x86: Re-synchronize TSC after KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 0:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 30/34] KVM: selftests: Add Xen runstate migration test David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 0:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 31/34] KVM: x86: Use ktime_get_snapshot_id() for master clock David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 1:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 32/34] KVM: x86: Compute kvmclock base without pvclock_gtod_data David Woodhouse
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 33/34] KVM: x86: Replace pvclock_gtod_data vclock_mode with boolean David Woodhouse
2026-06-09 1:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 34/34] KVM: x86: Remove pvclock_gtod_data and private timekeeping code David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608153358.DACED1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox