From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "William Bezenah" <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:05:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612160511.1B5101F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612155407.199218-1-wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] If deregistering indicators from the host fails with an error other than -ENODEV or -EINVAL (e.g., -EIO), virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() skips the cleanup of local adapter interrupt pointers, leading to a subsequent use-after-free when virtqueues are deleted.
--
commit 6f54104d3533aa779587af76d171dec3ef8e1b8f
Author: William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
This patch updates the error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL along with -ENODEV
during device detach. This avoids spurious warning messages in the
kernel log when detaching virtio devices with multiple queues.
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> vcdev->is_thinint ?
> VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND_ADAPTER :
> VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_SET_IND);
> - if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV))
> + if (ret && (ret != -ENODEV) && (ret != -EINVAL))
> dev_info(&vcdev->cdev->dev,
> "Failed to deregister indicators (%d)\n", ret);
> else if (vcdev->is_thinint)
> virtio_ccw_drop_indicators(vcdev);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this if/else structure create a
use-after-free risk during virtqueue deletion?
If ccw_io_helper() fails with an error other than -ENODEV or -EINVAL
(for example, -EIO), the first branch executes and logs the warning, but
the 'else if' branch is entirely skipped.
This means virtio_ccw_drop_indicators() is never called, failing to clear
the virtqueue pointers in the shared airq_info->aiv array.
Because virtio_ccw_del_vqs() subsequently proceeds to free these virtqueues
via vring_del_virtqueue(), the uncleared pointers in the shared airq_info
will point to freed memory.
If an adapter interrupt arrives later for this leaked bit, could
virtio_airq_handler() retrieve the dangling pointer and trigger a
use-after-free by calling vring_interrupt() on the freed queue?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612155407.199218-1-wbezenah@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 15:54 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach William Bezenah
2026-06-12 16:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-14 22:05 ` Halil Pasic
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612160511.1B5101F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wbezenah@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox