Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Omar Elghoul" <oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] s390/pci: Fence FMB enable/disable via sysfs for passthrough devices
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:22:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612182252.AAE141F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612181048.91548-5-oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch explicitly wraps a sleepable user-space memory copy (`kstrtoul_from_user()`) inside `mutex_lock(&zdev->kzdev_lock)`, introducing a lock-holding anti-pattern that can block system paths.
--

commit 0ba1ddb8db696b6bb98d1631644717f3b52b557c
Author: Omar Elghoul <oelghoul@linux.ibm.com>

s390/pci: Fence FMB enable/disable via sysfs for passthrough devices

This commit introduces a fence over enabling or disabling FMB via sysfs when
the zPCI device is associated with a KVM guest. This prevents the host from
disabling FMB while the guest is using it, securing the VM state.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci_debug.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci_debug.c
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci_debug.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci_debug.c
> @@ -149,9 +149,15 @@ static ssize_t pci_perf_seq_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
>  	if (!zdev)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&zdev->kzdev_lock);
> +	if (zdev->kzdev) {
> +		rc = -EPERM;
> +		goto out_unlock_kzdev;
> +	}
> +
>  	rc = kstrtoul_from_user(ubuf, count, 10, &val);

[Severity: Medium]
Is it necessary to hold kzdev_lock while copying from user-space?

Calling kstrtoul_from_user() here means we are holding the kzdev_lock mutex
during a potentially blocking memory copy. If the user-space read blocks, it
will indefinitely hold kzdev_lock, stalling any other operations
synchronizing on this device's lock.

Since kstrtoul_from_user() only parses data into a local stack variable and
does not depend on the device state, does it make sense to move this call
before acquiring kzdev_lock?

>  	if (rc)
> -		return rc;
> +		goto out_unlock_kzdev;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612181048.91548-1-oelghoul@linux.ibm.com?part=4

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 18:10 [PATCH v4 0/4] vfio-pci/zdev: Improved zPCI Function Measurement Support Omar Elghoul
2026-06-12 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] s390/pci: Hold fmb_lock when enabling or disabling PCI devices Omar Elghoul
2026-06-12 18:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] s390/pci: Preserve FMB state in device re-enablement Omar Elghoul
2026-06-12 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] vfio-pci/zdev: Add VFIO FMB device features Omar Elghoul
2026-06-12 18:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-12 18:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] s390/pci: Fence FMB enable/disable via sysfs for passthrough devices Omar Elghoul
2026-06-12 18:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612182252.AAE141F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oelghoul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox