Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: x86: Manually check DR4/5 write values to fix SVM intercept priority
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 23:28:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612232829.482311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612230113.684301-4-seanjc@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Lack of canonical address checks for DR0-DR3 writes allows malicious userspace or guests to crash the host kernel, and breaks nested virtualization exception priorities.
--

commit 85827e7c2e927fda473c503a8703cddac0182bb8
Author: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

KVM: x86: Manually check DR4/5 write values to fix SVM intercept priority

This patch manually pre-checks values written to DR4/5 (DR6/DR7 aliases) to
avoid relying on ->set_dr() for #GP signaling. This fixes an SVM intercept
priority issue where nSVM relies on the emulator to perform exception checks.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 4484c5fa19e33..a1bccab0eefee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -3853,15 +3853,23 @@ static int check_dr_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  static int check_dr_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  {
>  	u64 new_val = ctxt->src.val64;
> -	int dr = ctxt->modrm_reg;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	rc = check_dr_read(ctxt);
>  	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>  		return rc;
>  
> -	if ((dr == 6 || dr == 7) && (new_val & 0xffffffff00000000ULL))
> -		return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
> +	switch (ctxt->modrm_reg) {
> +	case 4:
> +	case 5:
> +	case 6:
> +	case 7:
> +		if (new_val & 0xffffffff00000000ULL)
> +			return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code need to check for canonical
addresses on DR0-DR3?

If a malicious guest forces instruction emulation of a write to DR0-DR3 with a
non-canonical address, this default case allows it to return X86EMUL_CONTINUE.

Since kvm_set_dr() also doesn't check for canonical addresses on DR0-DR3,
could this allow a non-canonical value to be written to vcpu->arch.db[0..3]?

If hardware breakpoints are active, KVM restores these registers using
set_debugreg(), which eventually calls native_set_debugreg():

arch/x86/include/asm/debugreg.h:native_set_debugreg() {
    ...
    case 0:
        asm("mov %0, %%db0" ::"r" (value));
        break;
    ...
}

Because this inline assembly lacks an exception table entry (_ASM_EXTABLE),
could writing a non-canonical address generate an unhandled #GP in host
kernel mode and crash the host?

Additionally, by omitting the #GP check in the emulator, would this incorrectly
synthesize a VM-exit to L1 instead of injecting a #GP to L2, breaking nested
virtualization exception priorities on SVM?

> +	}
>  
>  	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612230113.684301-1-seanjc@google.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 23:01 [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: x86: Fix emulated MOV DR{4,5} #GP bugs Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: x86: Treat any non-zero return from set_dr() as a faulting condition Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86: Prioritize DR7.GD #DB over #GP due to illegal DR6/7 value Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: x86: Manually check DR4/5 write values to fix SVM intercept priority Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: x86: Prioritize #UD on MOV DR over #GP due to non-zero CPL Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: VMX: Prioritize DR7.GD=1 #DB over CPL>0 #GP on Intel Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86: Use kvm_dr{6,7}_valid() to check DR{4,5,6,7} write values in emulator Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86: WARN if MOV DR emulation hits a "too late" #GP Sean Christopherson
2026-06-12 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86: Read CR4.DE in emulator if and only if accessing DR4 or DR5 Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612232829.482311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox