From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 10:07:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706100734.DE9C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-28-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Recompiling virt/kvm core code creates duplicate exported symbols, causing modpost failures or type confusion.
- [High] Concurrent execution of generic KVM initialization by two separate modules will clash on singleton resources like /dev/kvm.
- [High] The Makefile uses `nm -jU` and `objcopy -O default`, which are invalid for standard GNU binutils, breaking the build.
- [High] Core KVM files compiled for the arm64 module will incorrectly include the s390 architecture headers instead of arm64 headers.
--
commit 2fa0a606e2ea5038c2f6e6df6ba70d3165729ce4
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild
Add all Kbuild/Makefile configurations to build a second KVM module on
s390 implementing the arm64-KVM API. To prevent symbol conflicts with
kvm-s390 all internal symbols in kvm-arm64 are mangled if compiled as
built-in.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile b/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..566040725ab57
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
[ ... ]
> +include $(src)/Makefile.gen
> +
> +ccflags-y += -I $(src) -I $(objtree)/$(obj) -I$(srctree)/arch/s390/kvm/gmap -I$(srctree)/arch/arm64/include -I$(srctree)/arch/arm64/kvm -DKVM_S390_ARM64
[Severity: High]
Does this successfully override the architecture include path?
Kbuild places LINUXINCLUDE (which contains -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include
pointing to s390) before ccflags-y in the compiler invocation.
When the generic KVM code includes <asm/kvm_host.h>, will it incorrectly
resolve to the s390 header instead of the arm64 header, leading to compilation
errors or ABI mismatches?
> +
> +kvm-arm64-obj := \
> + arm.o \
[Severity: High]
Will compiling a second copy of the core KVM logic into the system duplicate
static resource registrations?
The generic KVM initialization code in kvm_init() assumes it is a singleton
per kernel and attempts to register the /dev/kvm misc device with a fixed
minor number. If both kvm-s390 and kvm-arm64 are loaded, will the second
module's initialization fail with -EBUSY when registering the misc device?
> + guest.o \
> + handle_exit.o \
> + inject_fault.o \
> + mmu.o \
> + mmio.o \
> + reset.o \
> +
> +kvm-arm64-obj += $(patsubst %.o,%-arm64.o,$(kvm-y))
[Severity: High]
Does recompiling the virt/kvm core code here create duplicate exported
symbols?
When configured as modules, compiling the generic KVM core a second time
results in modpost fatal errors for exported twice symbols. When configured
as built-in, objcopy --localize-symbols modifies the symbol table but fails
to strip __ksymtab data sections, leaving duplicate KVM exports in vmlinux.
Could this lead to unpredictable symbol resolution for modules like vfio?
[ ... ]
> +LDFLAGS_kvm-unnamespaced.o := -r --whole-archive
> +$(obj)/kvm-unnamespaced.o: $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(kvm-arm64-obj)) FORCE
> + $(call if_changed_rule,ld_o_o)
> +
> +# Make list of symbols to localize.
> +# Collect normal/exported symbols. Use dict as set for deduplication.
> +# TODO extract do script
> +quiet_cmd_nm_filter = NMFLTR $@
> + cmd_nm_filter = $(NM) -jU $< | sort -u > $@
[Severity: High]
Are the nm flags -jU supported by standard GNU binutils?
GNU nm lacks -j and -U, which are widely used in kernel builds. Will this
cause build failures when CONFIG_KVM_ARM64=y?
> +
> +$(obj)/kvm_symbol_list: $(obj)/kvm-unnamespaced.o FORCE
> + $(call if_changed,nm_filter)
> +
> +define rule_oc_o_o
> + $(call cmd_and_savecmd,objcopy)
> + $(call cmd,gen_objtooldep)
> + $(call cmd,gen_symversions_o)
> +endef
> +
> +OBJCOPYFLAGS_kvm-namespaced.o := -O default --localize-symbols=$(obj)/kvm_symbol_list
[Severity: High]
Is the -O default flag valid for GNU objcopy?
GNU objcopy rejects default as an invalid BFD target, which may break the
build when localizing these symbols.
> +$(obj)/kvm-namespaced.o: $(obj)/kvm-unnamespaced.o $(obj)/kvm_symbol_list FORCE
> + $(call if_changed_rule,oc_o_o)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706085229.979525-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=27
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 19:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 21:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 17:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:15 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706100734.DE9C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox