From: Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
To: <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>, <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
<jmattson@google.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
<nikunj.dadhania@amd.com>, <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
<santosh.shukla@amd.com>, <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: SVM: Refactor svm_update_lbrv()
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:29:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709082953.69434-2-shivansh.dhiman@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709082953.69434-1-shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
Rewrite the enable_lbrv computation in svm_update_lbrv() as a series of
'if' statements, and use nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv() instead of open-coding
the nested LBRV check.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>
---
Changelog:
v3:
* New patch.
* Refactor the enable_lbrv computation into 'if' statements (Yosry Ahmed).
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 10 +++++++---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index c1485c3e691c..d3df6b22bfef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int nested_svm_load_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3,
return 0;
}
-static bool nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+bool nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV) &&
(to_svm(vcpu)->nested.ctl.misc_ctl2 & SVM_MISC2_ENABLE_V_LBR);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index ef69a51ab27f..cead8f99d856 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -880,9 +880,13 @@ void svm_update_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
bool current_enable_lbrv = svm->vmcb->control.misc_ctl2 & SVM_MISC2_ENABLE_V_LBR;
- bool enable_lbrv = (svm->vmcb->save.dbgctl & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR) ||
- (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && guest_cpu_cap_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LBRV) &&
- (svm->nested.ctl.misc_ctl2 & SVM_MISC2_ENABLE_V_LBR));
+ bool enable_lbrv = false;
+
+ if (svm->vmcb->save.dbgctl & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR)
+ enable_lbrv = true;
+
+ if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(vcpu))
+ enable_lbrv = true;
if (enable_lbrv && !current_enable_lbrv)
__svm_enable_lbrv(vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 716be21fba33..8d77c10cf4f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -899,6 +899,7 @@ void nested_copy_vmcb_control_to_cache(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
void nested_copy_vmcb_save_to_cache(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
struct vmcb_save_area *save);
void nested_sync_control_from_vmcb02(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
+bool nested_vmcb12_has_lbrv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void svm_switch_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_vmcb_info *target_vmcb);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 8:29 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-09 8:29 ` Shivansh Dhiman [this message]
2026-07-09 19:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: SVM: Refactor svm_update_lbrv() Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-09 8:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: nSVM: Disable LBRV in nested control cache when unsupported Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-09 8:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 19:42 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-09 19:48 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-07-09 8:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-09 8:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 8:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: SVM: Compute DEBUGCTL reserved bits dynamically Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-09 8:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 8:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-09 8:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260709082953.69434-2-shivansh.dhiman@amd.com \
--to=shivansh.dhiman@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nikunj.dadhania@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox