Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>,
	"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Roman Kagan" <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7.1.y 3/3] KVM: x86: Unconditionally recompute CR8 intercept on PPR update
Date: Thu,  9 Jul 2026 15:21:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260709132109.3423488-5-clopez@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709132109.3423488-2-clopez@suse.de>

[ Upstream commit bb365a506b1e6fb050c0fceaad354fe395385ef0 ]

The TPR_THRESHOLD field in the VMCS is used by VMX to induce VM exits
when the guest's virtual TPR falls under the specified threshold,
allowing KVM to inject previously masked interrupts.

KVM handles these VM exits in handle_tpr_below_threshold().
Commit eb90f3417a0c ("KVM: vmx: speed up TPR below threshold vmexits")
optimized this function by calling apic_update_ppr() instead of raising
KVM_REQ_EVENT. apic_update_ppr() then raises KVM_REQ_EVENT if there is
a pending, deliverable interrupt.

However, if there are no new interrupts pending, apic_update_ppr() does
not issue the request. Thus, kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept() and
vmx_update_cr8_intercept() are not called before VM entry, which results
in a high, stale TPR_THRESHOLD. This is problematic due to the following
sentence in 28.2.1.1 "VM-Execution Control Fields" in the SDM:

  The following check is performed if the “use TPR shadow” VM-execution
  control is 1 and the “virtualize APIC accesses” and “virtual-interrupt
  delivery” VM-execution controls are both 0: the value of bits 3:0 of
  the TPR threshold VM-execution control field should not be greater
  than the value of bits 7:4 of VTPR.

This error condition is typically not observed when KVM runs on a bare
metal system because modern processors support APICv, which enables
virtual-interrupt delivery, and which KVM uses when possible. This
causes the processor to no longer generate TPR-below-threshold exits
and to no longer check TPR_THRESHOLD on entry. However, when running
on older platforms, or under nested virtualization on a hypervisor that
does not support virtual-interrupt delivery and enforces this check
(like Hyper-V) this can cause a VM entry failure with hardware error
0x7, as seen in [1].

Call kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept() if apic_update_ppr() does not
find a deliverable interrupt (and thus does not raise KVM_REQ_EVENT).
Remove calls to kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept() on paths that end up in
apic_update_ppr(), as they now become redundant. This ensures that any
path that updates the guest's PPR also figures out if KVM needs to wait
for a TPR change (using TPR_THRESHOLD on VMX or CR8 intercepts on SVM).

Link: https://github.com/coconut-svsm/svsm/issues/1081 [1]
Tested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: eb90f3417a0c ("KVM: vmx: speed up TPR below threshold vmexits")
Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20260618174347.1981064-3-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c   | 5 +----
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index f4574b5a16d8..63e068ae2982 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -980,6 +980,8 @@ static void apic_update_ppr(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
 	if (__apic_update_ppr(apic, &ppr) &&
 	    apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr(apic, ppr) != -1)
 		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, apic->vcpu);
+	else
+		kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept(apic->vcpu);
 }
 
 void kvm_apic_update_ppr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2c5bc03292e3..485df779ae67 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5339,7 +5339,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_lapic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	r = kvm_apic_set_state(vcpu, s);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
-	kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept(vcpu);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -12453,8 +12452,6 @@ static int __set_sregs_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs,
 	kvm_register_mark_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_CR3);
 	kvm_x86_call(post_set_cr3)(vcpu, sregs->cr3);
 
-	kvm_set_cr8(vcpu, sregs->cr8);
-
 	*mmu_reset_needed |= vcpu->arch.efer != sregs->efer;
 	kvm_x86_call(set_efer)(vcpu, sregs->efer);
 
@@ -12483,7 +12480,7 @@ static int __set_sregs_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs,
 	kvm_set_segment(vcpu, &sregs->tr, VCPU_SREG_TR);
 	kvm_set_segment(vcpu, &sregs->ldt, VCPU_SREG_LDTR);
 
-	kvm_lapic_update_cr8_intercept(vcpu);
+	kvm_set_cr8(vcpu, sregs->cr8);
 
 	/* Older userspace won't unhalt the vcpu on reset. */
 	if (kvm_vcpu_is_bsp(vcpu) && kvm_rip_read(vcpu) == 0xfff0 &&
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-09 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 13:21 [PATCH 7.1.y 0/3] KVM: x86: Backports for VM entry failure due to stale CR8 intercept Carlos López
2026-07-09 13:21 ` [PATCH 7.1.y 1/3] KVM: x86: Move update_cr8_intercept() to lapic.c Carlos López
2026-07-09 13:21 ` [PATCH 7.1.y 2/3] KVM: VMX: Grab vmcs12 on CR8 interception update iff vCPU is in guest mode Carlos López
2026-07-09 13:21 ` Carlos López [this message]
2026-07-09 14:26 ` [PATCH 7.1.y 0/3] KVM: x86: Backports for VM entry failure due to stale CR8 intercept Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260709132109.3423488-5-clopez@suse.de \
    --to=clopez@suse.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox