From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Josh Hilke" <jrhilke@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Recover after DMA-read faults
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:33:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710223343.65ADF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-igb_v3_b4-v4-9-56e7e2576cc1@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Using a fixed heuristic delay before `vfio_pci_device_reset()` causes test flakes due to `ioctl_assert` failing on `-EAGAIN`.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v4 9/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Recover after DMA-read faults ---
commit 774200982f984c4b603b9d07688586c25dcf8c58
Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@nvidia.com>
vfio: selftests: igb: Recover after DMA-read faults
This commit adds a mechanism to recover from DMA-read faults in the igb
selftest by issuing a VFIO_DEVICE_RESET. It introduces a 10ms heuristic
delay before the reset to allow PCIe/IOMMU/AER error handling to complete
and release the device lock.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/drivers/igb/igb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/drivers/igb/igb.c
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/drivers/igb/igb.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/lib/drivers/igb/igb.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -490,7 +512,28 @@ static int igb_memcpy_wait(struct vfio_pci_device *device)
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * The descriptor never completed. On real 82576 hardware this
> + * typically follows a DMA-read fault from one of the intentional
> + * unmapped-IOVA tests; the fault leaves the descriptor engine
> + * unable to service subsequent valid descriptors. CTRL.RST alone
> + * reinitializes the queue registers but leaves the engine wedged
> + * for the current process, so a broader VFIO_DEVICE_RESET (FLR)
> + * is required.
> + *
> + * Delay before requesting reset so PCIe/IOMMU/AER error handling
> + * triggered by the just-observed DMA fault can release the device
> + * lock VFIO_DEVICE_RESET contends for. The 10 ms value is
> + * heuristic. The current memcpy still fails with -ETIMEDOUT;
> + * recovery only ensures the next memcpy starts from a usable state.
> + */
> + usleep(10000);
> + igb_error_reset_and_reinit(device);
[Severity: Medium]
Since the 10ms delay is a heuristic, what happens if asynchronous PCIe AER
recovery (which can involve link resets and training) takes longer than
10ms?
If the device lock is still held when igb_error_reset_and_reinit() calls
vfio_pci_device_reset(), the underlying ioctl will return -EAGAIN.
Because vfio_pci_device_reset() internally uses ioctl_assert() which expects
a return value of 0, returning -EAGAIN will immediately abort the test
program, resulting in a flaky test if the timing is missed.
Would it be more robust to explicitly retry the VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl on
-EAGAIN instead of relying on a fixed sleep and an unconditional assert?
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260710-igb_v3_b4-v4-0-56e7e2576cc1@google.com?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 22:06 [PATCH v4 0/9] vfio: selftests: Add driver for Intel Ethernet Gigabit Controller (IGB) Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Add driver for IGB QEMU device Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Use PHY internal loopback on 82576 Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Use advanced TX and RX descriptors Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Program MSI-X interrupt routing Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Extend memcpy completion timeout for line-rate hardware Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Disable PCIe completion timeout retries Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] vfio: selftests: Add helpers to re-enable interrupts Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Factor hardware programming into igb_hw_init() Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] vfio: selftests: igb: Recover after DMA-read faults Josh Hilke
2026-07-10 22:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710223343.65ADF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox