Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@kernel.org, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
	schlameuss@linux.ibm.com, gra@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: s390: Return -EFAULT instead of PGM_ADDRESSING
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:44:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714084444.55132-I-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713150857.269954-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> If kvm_s390_set_cmma_bits() is asked to set CMMA values outside of a
> memslot, PGM_ADDRESSING (5) is returned, instead of a negative error
> value. Same issue with kvm_s390_{g,s}et_skeys().
> 
> Fix by returning -EFAULT whenever the return value would be > 0, which
> is consistent with the behaviour before the gmap rewrite.
> 
> Fixes: e38c884df921 ("KVM: s390: Switch to new gmap")
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 374dae6dae81..53691aaf6534 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_get_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
>  	}
>  
>  	kvfree(keys);
> -	return r;
> +	return r <= 0 ? r : -EFAULT;
>  }
>  
>  static int kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
> @@ -2274,7 +2274,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
>  	kvm_s390_free_mmu_cache(mc);
>  out:
>  	kvfree(keys);
> -	return r;
> +	return r <= 0 ? r : -EFAULT;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2384,7 +2384,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_cmma_bits(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>  	set_bit(GMAP_FLAG_USES_CMM, &kvm->arch.gmap->flags);
>  
> -	return r;
> +	return r <= 0 ? r : -EFAULT;
>  }

Wouldnt it make more sense to let dat_set_cmma_bits return -EFAULT?
(there the PGM_ADDRESSING might come from)

at least change the documentation of this function that it might return
PGM_ADDRESSING in case of an error.

Similary, dat_{g,s}et_storage_keys may return -EFAULT or at least have
this behaviour documented.


	Steffen

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13 15:08 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  8:32   ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-14 13:23   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: s390: Return -EFAULT instead of PGM_ADDRESSING Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14  8:44   ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-14 12:48   ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-14 12:51   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-13 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal was pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-13 15:33   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260714084444.55132-I-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox