Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] s390/mm: Remove folio handling for secure storage access exceptions
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:14:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716141436.2125703-4-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716141436.2125703-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>

Remove folio handling for secure storage access exceptions that happen
via the kernel mapping. Using folio_try_get() for exceptions via the
kernel mapping is racy: for example such an exception may happen on one
CPU, while a different CPU frees the corresponding page. Subsequently the
page can be part of a folio of different size, before the faulting CPU
executes folio_try_get(). This may lead to data corruption.

As of now this scenario does not seem to be possible, however with the
upcoming load_unaligned_zeropad() this is possible.

As a side effect PG_arch_1 is not cleared anymore for such faults via the
kernel mapping. However given that this bit is over-indicating it
shouldn't matter.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index 392e46742039..db77c8c0023e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -440,13 +440,7 @@ void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (is_kernel_fault(regs)) {
 		if (is_vmalloc_addr((void *)addr))
 			return handle_fault_error_nolock(regs, 0);
-		folio = virt_to_folio((void *)addr);
-		if (unlikely(!folio_try_get(folio)))
-			return;
-		rc = uv_convert_from_secure(folio_to_phys(folio));
-		if (!rc)
-			clear_bit(PG_arch_1, &folio->flags.f);
-		folio_put(folio);
+		rc = uv_convert_from_secure(__pa(addr));
 		/*
 		 * There are some valid fixup types for kernel
 		 * accesses to donated secure memory. zeropad is one
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16 14:14 [PATCH 0/4] s390: Reintroduce support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS Heiko Carstens
2026-07-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: s390: pv: Use VM_SPARSE area for guest variable storage area Heiko Carstens
2026-07-16 14:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] s390/mm: Fix handling of secure storage access exceptions in vmalloc area Heiko Carstens
2026-07-16 14:14 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-07-16 14:19   ` [PATCH 3/4] s390/mm: Remove folio handling for secure storage access exceptions David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-16 14:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] s390: Add support for DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS (again) Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716141436.2125703-4-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox