From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:35:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716183547.1B8A21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716181456.402786-21-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Skipping SPTE prefetch for pages with memory attributes leaks the `struct page` reference.
--
--- Patch [20]: [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes ---
commit f42ac0f993cf93f62265ecaa532948b8790213ce
Author: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@amazon.com>
KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes
This commit modifies KVM's MMU prefetching to check for memory attributes on
each GFN. If memory protections are applied to a GFN, the code skips
prefetching the SPTE for that page.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 59c2a04f5648c..8e85f672a08d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3156,6 +3156,9 @@ static bool kvm_mmu_prefetch_sptes(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, u64 *sptep,
> return false;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, gfn++, sptep++) {
> + if (kvm_get_memory_attributes(vcpu->kvm, gfn))
> + continue;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this leak the struct page reference?
Earlier in kvm_mmu_prefetch_sptes(), kvm_prefetch_pages() populates the
pages[] array, which elevates the reference count for each page. By using
continue here, the loop skips over the required cleanup call at the bottom
of the loop:
kvm_release_page_dirty(pages[i]);
Should this code release the page before continuing to the next iteration?
> mmu_set_spte(vcpu, slot, sptep, access, gfn,
> page_to_pfn(pages[i]), NULL);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716181456.402786-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 18:14 [RFC PATCH 00/24] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 01/24] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 02/24] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 03/24] KVM: x86: hyperv: Introduce memory fault on hcalls with bad ingpas Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 04/24] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 05/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 06/24] KVM: x86: Avoid warning when installing non-private memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 07/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 08/24] KVM: pass kvm == NULL case to kvm_arch_has_private_mem Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 09/24] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 10/24] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 11/24] KVM: Take memory protections into account in kvm_read/write_guest() Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 19:17 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 12/24] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 13/24] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 14/24] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 15/24] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 16/24] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 17/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 19:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 18/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 19/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not update accessed/dirty if guest PTE is read-only Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 20/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 21/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 22/24] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 23/24] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 18:14 ` [PATCH 24/24] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-07-16 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716183547.1B8A21F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox