From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB1E3C76A2; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784539385; cv=none; b=lll0WYmwJX9UX6KZHBBLCdbJMW/iD4PuKtliotcZMjqet8eg0+KS7lw2pAuVKaRHDKZkPybZNFI3x18VaqhqDZB2Xmj/emSWpmNz5Rr/KRoKxDFR09KEgPIWDEf/pQGz6MjOtE+oeYwSWAcvS5FRaYaxtvl/mhzZEBCnZhAiUWs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784539385; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uxTilCazAdsvHYjpVGETKxBjgtfpBJla7McqRYwl3tQ=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=reIvEfj7ctVasB6BCLgrO4yNCS+uYlQu2cgpG59zHR1NunBHKXoRLauyVnWPGrN9Ye+PUB/kkEcIdp/fVgml0cUH3WGSz2drhRhsolngeT91TDpaTvJHI8o5gzzPFwswA5sKC/ON9+rTA7EoyopHnbewS8eiwtPynY/1HmKC+70= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=EqjXgYib; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="EqjXgYib" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96D791F000E9; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:23:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784539383; bh=uxTilCazAdsvHYjpVGETKxBjgtfpBJla7McqRYwl3tQ=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=EqjXgYib8VowkZK+qtfHjlQtBYskgMP29o7WcT6dmLjNs+cgb/cYzeYPshBPIJ1/2 +sM8WCzeh4K6cPyg5pkR5Xba5FvtkEjlf7AveJO7loxsTd0bXIgSaeEf0TPbJtP0Ds NBGCNOEi5sgmPuKoLImRdgXabxf7viVSXb7LQIoTridCVePApaKsaR911mXXGiTPue 3+NBv0Ru5UFVzioUWgvBwpP91F0zfRQch/pjuMwdth/Kxueb2IKt0rHli3UffVEO0K nWrPPzY0kwc9ofL9MIi70wfEti3+t/43KBwED3+Rh4qMkjnCi/7GfFdgJc+Ux7Jqd0 6NPmmgoWpI/hQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] s390/mm: Fix handling of vmalloc area in do_secure_storage_access() Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Heiko Carstens" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" , "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260720085834.898025-5-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260720085834.898025-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> <20260720085834.898025-5-hca@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:23:03 +0000 Message-Id: <20260720092303.96D791F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Secure storage access exceptions in vmalloc area need to be handled > separately since folio_try_get() or virt_to_phys() do not work on such > addresses. Given that there cannot be a valid access let such exceptions > fail immediately. The kernel will either fixup or crash. >=20 > Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720085834.8980= 25-1-hca@linux.ibm.com?part=3D4