From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/20] KVM: VMX: Remove unused control-register access defines
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:19:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720171949.498680-7-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720171949.498680-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
CONTROL_REG_ACCESS_REG becomes misleading with EGPRs. Rather than leave
stale, unused definitions behind, remove them all.
Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
---
V4 -> V5: New patch
When looking around DEBUG_REG_ACCESS_REG() for the next patch, this dead
code was discovered.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
index ed2ded531e55..30cf48e1c390 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
@@ -444,27 +444,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
/*
* Exit Qualifications for MOV for Control Register Access
*/
-#define CONTROL_REG_ACCESS_NUM 0x7 /* 2:0, number of control reg.*/
-#define CONTROL_REG_ACCESS_TYPE 0x30 /* 5:4, access type */
-#define CONTROL_REG_ACCESS_REG 0xf00 /* 10:8, general purpose reg. */
#define LMSW_SOURCE_DATA_SHIFT 16
#define LMSW_SOURCE_DATA (0xFFFF << LMSW_SOURCE_DATA_SHIFT) /* 16:31 lmsw source */
-#define REG_EAX (0 << 8)
-#define REG_ECX (1 << 8)
-#define REG_EDX (2 << 8)
-#define REG_EBX (3 << 8)
-#define REG_ESP (4 << 8)
-#define REG_EBP (5 << 8)
-#define REG_ESI (6 << 8)
-#define REG_EDI (7 << 8)
-#define REG_R8 (8 << 8)
-#define REG_R9 (9 << 8)
-#define REG_R10 (10 << 8)
-#define REG_R11 (11 << 8)
-#define REG_R12 (12 << 8)
-#define REG_R13 (13 << 8)
-#define REG_R14 (14 << 8)
-#define REG_R15 (15 << 8)
/*
* Exit Qualifications for MOV for Debug Register Access
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 17:19 [PATCH v5 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] KVM: nVMX: Propagate extended instruction information Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] KVM: x86: Move KVM_SUPPORTED_{XCR0,XSS} into kvm_x86_vendor_init() Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX in supported XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to userspace Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-07-20 18:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 17:19 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
2026-07-21 7:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720171949.498680-7-chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox