From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
dsterba@suse.cz, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] btrfs: fix folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() for folios dirtied behind btrfs' back
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:26:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721192631.6E42F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721191152.101118-2-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
> A folio can carry the folio-level dirty flag while its btrfs subpage
> dirty bitmap is empty: btrfs data mappings use filemap_dirty_folio(),
> so a generic folio_mark_dirty() call sets only the folio flag and the
> xarray tag, without setting any subpage dirty bit and without a
> delalloc reservation. The typical source is set_page_dirty_lock() on
> a GUP pin, e.g. the s390 KVM irq adapter path
> (adapter_indicators_set()) which pins guest indicator pages living in
> a file-backed guest RAM file, sets a bit and marks the page dirty.
>
> When writeback then picks up such a folio, writepage_delalloc()
> copies the empty subpage dirty bitmap into
> bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, sets up no range locks (nr_locked stays 0),
> finds no delalloc range, and finally hits
>
> if (bitmap_empty(bio_ctrl->submit_bitmap, blocks_per_folio)) {
> [ ... ]
> filesystem was not informed about.
>
> Fixes: bd610c0937aa ("btrfs: only unlock the to-be-submitted ranges inside a folio")
> Assisted-by: Claude
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721191152.101118-2-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 19:11 7.2-rc1 regression Folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-21 19:11 ` [PATCH/RFC] btrfs: fix folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() for folios dirtied behind btrfs' back Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-21 19:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-21 21:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-22 8:35 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 8:59 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-22 9:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 9:35 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-22 10:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 12:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-07-23 0:42 ` Qu Wenruo
[not found] ` <amICQYTK9Xu4KLtH@casper.infradead.org>
2026-07-23 22:40 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-25 6:26 ` Boris Burkov
2026-07-27 8:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-27 8:41 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-07-27 12:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-22 7:21 ` 7.2-rc1 regression Folio lock leak in writepage_delalloc() Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721192631.6E42F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox